Benefits of site-specific hazard analyses for seismic design in New Zealand




This paper summarizes the role site-specific seismic hazard analyses can play in seismic design and assessment in New Zealand. The additional insights and potential improvements in the seismic design and assessment process through a better understanding of the ground motion hazard are examined through a comparative examination with prescriptive design guidelines. Benefits include the utilization of state-of-the-art knowledge, improved representation of site response, reduced conservatism, and the determination of dominant seismic source properties, among others. The paper concludes with a discussion of these relative benefits so that the efficacy of site-specific hazard analysis for a particular project can be better judged by the engineer.


SNZ (2004). "Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand". Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. 82 pp.

NZTA (2013). "Bridge Manual: SP//M/022. Ch5: Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures". New Zealand Transport Agency, 23 pp.

NZTA (2014). "Bridge Manual: SP//M/022. Ch6: Site-Stability, Foundations, Earthworks, and Retaining Walls". New Zealand Transport Agency, 42 pp.

NZGS (2010). "Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Practice: Module 1 - Guideline for the Identification, Assessment and Mitigation of Liquefaction Hazards". New Zealand Geotechnical Society. 34 pp.

McVerry GH, Zhao JX, Abrahamson NA and Somerville PG (2006). "New Zealand Acceleration Response Spectrum Attenuation Relations for Crustal and Subduction Zone Earthquakes". Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering; 39(1): 1-58. DOI:

SNZ (2004). "Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand - Commentary". Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. 86 pp.

Bradley BA (2012). "Ground Motion and Seismicity Aspects of the 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes". Technical Report Prepared for the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. 62 pp.

Bradley BA, Quigley MC, Van Dissen RJ and Litchfield NJ (2014). "Ground Motion and Seismic Source Aspects of the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence". Earthquake Spectra; 30(1): 1-15. doi:10.1193/030113eqs060m DOI:

Cornell CA (1968). "Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; 58(5): 1583–1606.

Bradley BA (2014). "Seismic Hazard Analysis for Urban Christchurch Accounting for the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence". Technical report prepared for the New Zealand Earthquake Commission (EQC) and Tonkin & Taylor Ltd. 20 pp.

Gerstenberger M, McVerry G, Rhoades D and Stirling M (2014). "Seismic Hazard Modeling for the Recovery of Christchurch". Earthquake Spectra; 30(1): 17-29. doi:10.1193/021913eqs037m DOI:

McVerry G (2003). "From Hazard Maps to Code Spectra for New Zealand". in 2003 Pacific conference on earthquake engineering: Christchurch, New Zealand, 9.

Field EH, Gupta N, Gupta V, Blanpied M, Maechling P and Jordan TH (2005). "Hazard Calculations for the Wgcep-2002 Forecast Using Opensha and Distributed Object Technologies". Seismological Research Letters; 76 161-167. DOI:

Bradley BA and Cubrinovski M (2011). "Near-Source Strong Ground Motions Observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake". Seismological Research Letters; 82(6): 853-865. doi:10.1785/gssrl.82.6.853 DOI:

Bradley BA (2012). "Strong Ground Motion Characteristics Observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield, New Zealand Earthquake". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering; 42 32-46. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.004 DOI:

Stirling M, McVerry G, Gerstenberger M, Litchfield N, Van Dissen R, Berryman K, Barnes P, Wallace L, Villamor P, Langridge R, Lamarche G, Nodder S, Reyners M, Bradley B, Rhoades D, Smith W, Nicol A, Pettinga J, Clark K and Jacobs K (2012). "National Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand: 2010 Update". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; 102(4): 1514-1542. doi:10.1785/0120110170 DOI:

Stirling MW, McVerry GH and Berryman KR (2002). "A New Seismic Hazard Model for New Zealand". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; 92(5): 1878–1903. DOI:

Bradley BA (2010). "NZ-Specific Pseudo-Spectral Acceleration Ground Motion Prediction Equations Based on Foreign Models". Report No.2010-03, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand. 324 pp.

Bradley BA (2013). "A New Zealand-Specific Pseudospectral Acceleration Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for Active Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on Foreign Models". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; 103(3): 1801-1822. doi:10.1785/0120120021 DOI:

Bradley BA (2015). "Systematic Ground Motion Observations in the Canterbury Earthquakes and Region-Specific Non-Ergodic Empirical Ground Motion Modeling". Earthquake Spectra; (in press). doi:10.1193/053013eqs137m DOI:

Bradley BA (2012). "Ground Motions Observed in the Darfield and Christchurch Earthquakes and the Importance of Local Site Response Effects". New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics; 55(3): 279-286. doi:10.1080/00288306.2012.674049 DOI:

Campbell KW and Bozorgnia Y (2008). "NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s". Earthquake Spectra; 24(1): 139-171. DOI:

Seyhan E, Stewart JP, Ancheta TD, Darragh RB and Graves RW (2014). "NGA-West2 Site Database". Earthquake Spectra; 30(3): 1007-1024. doi:10.1193/062913EQS180M DOI:

Bradley BA, Cubrinovski M, Dhakal RP and MacRae GA (2010). "Probabilistic Seismic Performance and Loss Assessment of a Bridge-Foundation-Soil System". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering; 30(5): 395-411. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.012 DOI:

Hancock J (2006). "The Influence of Duration and the Selection and Scaling of Accelerograms in Engineering Design and Assessment". Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College: London, 442 pp.

Raghunandan M and Liel AB (2013). "Effect of Ground Motion Duration on Earthquake-Induced Structural Collapse". Structural Safety; 41(0): 119-133. doi: DOI:

Bradley BA (2010). "A Generalized Conditional Intensity Measure Approach and Holistic Ground-Motion Selection". Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics; 39(12): 1321-1342. doi:10.1002/eqe.995 DOI:

Bradley BA (2012). "A Ground Motion Selection Algorithm Based on the Generalized Conditional Intensity Measure Approach". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering; 40(0): 48-61. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.007 DOI:

Chandramohan R, Baker JW and Deierlein GG (2014). "Hazard-Consistent Ground Motion Duration: Calculation Procedure and Impact on Structural Collapse Risk". Proceedings of the Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Anchorage, Alaska, 10.

Oyarzo-Vera CA, McVerry GH and Ingham JM (2012). "Seismic Zonation and Default Suite of Ground-Motion Records for Time-History Analysis in the North Island of New Zealand". Earthquake Spectra; 28(2): 667-688. doi:10.1193/1.4000016 DOI:

Bradley BA (2012). "Ground Motion Comparison of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan and 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquakes: Implications for Large Events in New Zealand". New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference: Christchurch, New Zealand, 8 pp.

Abrahamson NA, Atkinson GM, Boore DM, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW, Chiou B, Idriss IM, Silva WJ and Youngs RR (2008). "Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations". Earthquake Spectra; 24(1): 45-66. DOI:




How to Cite

Bradley, B. A. (2015). Benefits of site-specific hazard analyses for seismic design in New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 48(2), 92–99.