Suitability of CFT columns for New Zealand moment frames

Abstract

Composite steel-concrete construction uses steel and concrete together to provide the possibility of a system with better performance, and/or lower cost, than using either material alone. This paper firstly subjectively evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of a number of composite concrete filled tubular (CFT) column-connection systems proposed/used around the world in terms of their likely acceptance in moment frames in New Zealand. Then, the cost of a conventional one-way moment-resisting steel frame system is compared with a similarly behaving frame using rectangular concrete filled steel tubular (CFT) columns. It is shown for these studies conducted on one-way frames that composite CFT column construction with beam end-plate connections is generally more expensive than conventional steel column construction.

References

ACI (2003) “A Century of Progress”. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hill, MI, USA.

Hill G (1898). “Steel-Concrete Construction”. Transactions of ASCE, 39: 617-635.

Viest IM, Colaco JP, Furlong RW, Griffis LG, Leon RT and Wyllie LA (1997). “Composite Construction Design for Buildings”. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Freitag JK (1898). “The Fireproofing of Steel Buildings”. Wiley, New York.

Ralson M and Korman R (1989). “Put that in Your Pipe and Cure it”. Engineering News Record, 22(7): 44-53

Morino S and Tsuda K (2003). “Design and Construction of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Column System in Japan”. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, 4(1): 51-73.

AISC (2010). “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings”. ANSI/AISC 360-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, USA.

MacRae GA, Clifton GC, Mackinven H, Mago N, Butterworth J and Pampanin S (2010). “The Sliding Hinge Joint Moment Connection”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 43(3): 202-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.3.202-212

Deierlein GG, Sheikh TM, Yura JA and Jirsa JO (1989). "Part 2: Beam Column Moment Connections for Composite Frames". ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 115(11): 2877-2896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:11(2877)

Elremaily A and Azizinamini A (2001). “Design Provisions for Connections Between Steel Beams and Concrete Filled Tube Columns”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 57(9): 971-995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00016-5

Toshiyuki F and Koji M (2005). “Elastoplastic Behavior of Panel Zone in Steel Beam-to-Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column Moment Connections”. Journal of Structural Engineering 131(12): 1841-1853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1841)

Shin KJ, Kim YJ, Oh YS and Moon TS (2004). “Behavior of Welded CFT Column to H-Beam Connections with External Stiffeners”. Engineering Structures, 26(13): 1877-1887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.016

Agheshlui H, Yao H, Goldsworthy H, Gad EF and Fernando S (2012). “Blind-Bolted Moment Resisting Connections to Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns”. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal.

Sheet IS, Gunasekaran U and MacRae GA (2013). “Experimental Investigation of CFT Column to Steel Beam Connections under Cyclic Loading”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 86: 167–182.

Li X, Xiao Y, Wu YT (2009). “Seismic Behavior of Exterior Connections with Steel Beams Bolted to CFT Columns”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(7): 1438-1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.03.009

Wu LY, Chung LL, Tsai SF, Shen TJ and Huang GL (2005). "Seismic Behavior of Bolted Beam-to-Column Connections for Concrete Filled Steel Tube". Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(10): 1387-1410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.03.007

Ricles JM, Peng SW and Lu LW (2004). “Seismic Behavior of Composite Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column-Wide Flange Beam Moment Connections”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 130: 223-232.

Swanson J and Leon RT (2000). “Bolted Steel Connections: Tests on T-Stub Components”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(1): 50-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(50)

FEMA (2000). “State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking”. FEMA-355C, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

HERA (2003) “Structural steelwork connections guide design procedures”. HERA Report R4-100.1, New Zealand Heavy Engineering Research Association, Manukau, NZ.

Alostaz YM and Schneider SP (1996). “Analytical Behavior of Connections to Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 40(2): 95-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(96)00047-8

Clifton C (2005). “Semi-Rigid Joints for Moment-Resisting Steel Framed Seismic-Resisting Systems”. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, NZ.

MacRae GA and Clifton GC (2013). “Low Damage Steel Construction”. Paper 1, Steel Innovations Conference, 21-22 February 2013, Christchurch, NZ.

Carr AJ (2008). “Ruaumoko Manual Volume 2 User Manual for the 2 Dimensional Version Ruaumoko2D”. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.

MacRae GA, Walpole WR and Carr AJ (1991). “Behaviour and Design of Moment-Resisting Steel Frames”. Proceedings of Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, November 1991, Auckland, NZ.

Standards New Zealand (1997). "NZS3404: Steel Structures Standard”. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, NZ, 283 pp.

Clifton GC (2013). “CIVIL713 Structural And Design 4, Fire Engineering Notes” First Semester 2013, University of Auckland, NZ.

Rawlinson (2012). “Rawlison New Zealand Construction Handbook”. Rawlinson Media Limited, NZ.

BS EN (2005). “Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1-2, General Rules, Structural Fire Design”. BS EN 1994-1-2.

Published
2015-03-31
How to Cite
Chunhaviriyakul, P., MacRae, G. A., Anderson, D., Clifton, G. C., & Leon, R. T. (2015). Suitability of CFT columns for New Zealand moment frames. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 48(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.48.1.63-79
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>