Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.4.231-252

Abstract

In this paper, representative ground motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand are developed. Cases considered include representative ground motions for the occurrence of Alpine, Hope and Porters Pass earthquakes in Christchurch city, and the occurrence of Wellington, Wairarapa and Ohariu fault ruptures in Wellington city. For each considered scenario rupture, ensembles of 20 and 7 ground motions are selected using the generalized conditional intensity measure (GCIM) approach, ensuring that the ground motion ensembles represent both the mean and distribution of ground motion intensity which such scenarios could impose. These scenario-based ground motion sets can be used to complement ground motions which are often selected in conjunction with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, in order to understand the performance of structures for the question “what if this fault ruptures?”

References

Bommer, J.J. (2002) "Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy". Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 6(spec01): p. 43-73.

Baker, J.W. (2010) "Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection". Journal of Structural Engineering. 137(3): p. 322-331.

Bommer, J.J. and Acevedo, A.B. (2004) "The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis". Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 8(spec01): p. 43-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350521

Jayaram, N., Lin, T. and Baker, J.W. (2011) "A computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance". Earthquake Spectra. 27(3): p. 797-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3608002

Kottke, A. and Rathje, E.M. (2008) "A semi-automated procedure for selecting and scaling recorded earthquake motions for dynamic analysis". Earthquake Spectra. 24(4): p. 911-932. (a) (b) (c) (d) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2985772

Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J.E. (1998) "Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses". Earthquake Spectra. 14(3): p. 469-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011

Wang, G. (2011) "A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 31(4): p. 611-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.007

Katsanos, E.I., Sextos, A.G. and Manolis, G.D. (2010) "Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 30(4): p. 157-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005

Oyarzo-Vera, C.A., McVerry, G.H. and Ingham, J.M. (2012) "Seismic zonation and default suite of ground-motion records for time-history analysis in the North Island of New Zealand". Earthquake Spectra. 28(2): p. 667-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000016

NZS1170.5, "NZS1170.5:2004, Structural design actions. Part 5: Earthquake actions ‐ New Zealand", 2004, Standards New Zealand: Wellington, NZ.

Bradley, B.A. (2010) "A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground‐motion selection". Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 39(12): p. 1321-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.995

Bradley, B.A. (2012) "A ground motion selection algorithm based on the generalized conditional intensity measure approach". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 40: p. 48-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.007

Bradley, B.A. (2012) "The seismic demand hazard and importance of the conditioning intensity measure". Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 41(11): p. 1417-1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2221

Tarbali, K. and Bradley, B.A. "Ground-motion selection for scenario ruptures using the generalized conditional intensity measure (GCIM) approach and its application for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand. University of Canterbury Research Report No. 2014-03", 2014: Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. p. 92.

Tarbali, K. and Bradley, B.A. (2014) "Scenario-based ground-motion selection using the generalized conditional intensity measure (GCIM) approach". in Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2546

Stirling, M., McVerry, G., Gerstenberger, M., Litchfield, N., Van Dissen, R., Berryman, K., Barnes, P., Wallace, L., Villamor, P. and Langridge, R. (2012) "National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 102(4): p. 1514-1542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110170

Bradley, B.A. (2013) "A New Zealand‐Specific Pseudospectral Acceleration Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation for Active Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on Foreign Models". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 103(3): p. 1801-1822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120021

Field, E.H.,. Jordan, T.H. and Cornell, C.A. (2003) "OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis". Seismological Research Letters. 74(4): p. 406-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.4.406

Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2010) "A ground motion prediction equation for the horizontal component of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) based on the PEER-NGA strong motion database". Earthquake Spectra. 26(3): p. 635-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3457158

Bommer, J.J., Stafford, P.J. and Alarcón, J.E. (2009) "Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 99(6): p. 3217-3233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080298

Tothong, P. and Cornell, C.A., "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures, attenuation relationships and near-fault effects. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA", 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.696

Bradley, B.A., Araki, K., Ishii, T. and Saitoh, K. (2013) "Effect of lattice-shaped ground improvement geometry on seismic response of liquefiable soil deposits via 3-D seismic effective stress analysis". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 48: p. 35-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.027

Villaverde, R. (2007) "Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures: State of the art". Journal of Structural Engineering. 133(1): p. 57-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(57)

Bradley, B.A. (2010) "Site-specific and spatially distributed ground-motion prediction of acceleration spectrum intensity". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 100(2): p. 792-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090157

Bradley, B.A., Cubrinovski, M., MacRae, G.A. and Dhakal, R.P. (2009) "Ground-motion prediction equation for SI based on spectral acceleration equations". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 99(1): p. 277-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080044

Bradley, B.A. (2011) "Empirical equations for the prediction of displacement spectrum intensity and its correlation with other intensity measures". Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 31(8): p. 1182-1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.007

Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W. (2008) "NGA project strong-motion database". Earthquake Spectra. 24(1): p. 23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894831

ASCE/SEI7-10, "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia", 2010.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2014

How to Cite

Tarbali, K., & Bradley, B. A. (2014). Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand . Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(4), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.4.231-252

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories