Seismic analysis of in-plane loaded walls in unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms

Abstract

It is well recognised that the dynamic response of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible timber diaphragms typically contains multiple dominant modes associated with the excitations of the diaphragms and the in-plane walls. Existing linear analysis methods for this type of structure commonly account for the multi-mode behaviour by assuming the independent vibrations of the in-plane loaded walls (in-plane walls) and the diaphragms. Specifically, the in-plane walls are considered to be rigid and the unmodified ground motion is assumed to be transmitted up the walls to the diaphragm ends. While this assumption may be appropriate for many low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings, neglecting the dynamic interaction between the diaphragms and the in-plane walls can lead to unreliable predictions of seismic demands. An alternative analysis approach is proposed in this paper, based on the mode properties of a system in which (1) the mass ratios between the diaphragms and the in-plane wall are the same at all levels, and (2) the periods of the diaphragms are the same at all levels. It is proposed that under these conditions, two modes are typically sufficient to obtain the peak seismic demands of the in-plane walls in elastically responding low-rise regular buildings. The applicability of the two-mode analysis approach is assessed for more general diaphragm configurations by sensitivity analysis, and the limitations are identified. The two-mode approach is then used to derive a response modification factor, which may be used in conjunction with a linear static procedure in the seismic assessment of buildings with flexible diaphragms.

References

ASCE (2013). “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings”. ASCE/SEI 41-13, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.

Abrams, D.P. (2001). “Performance-based engineering concepts for unreinforced masonry building structures”. Prog. Struct. Engng Mater., 3, 48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.70

NZSEE (2006). “Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes”. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.

Wilson, A., Quenneville, P. and Ingham, J. (2013). “Natural period and seismic idealization of flexible timber diaphragms”. Earthquake Spectra, 29(3), 1003- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000162

Kim, S.-C. and White, D.W. (2004). “Linear static analysis of low-rise buildings with flexible diaphragms using the structural separation method”. Engineering Structures, 26, 83-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.013

Knox, C. (2012). “Assessment of perforated unreinforced masonry walls responding in-plane”. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland.

Fleischmann, R.B., and Farrow, K.T. (2001). “Dynamic behaviour of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, 745-763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.36

Lee, H.J., Aschheim, M.A. and Kuchma, D. (2007). “Interstory drift estimates for low-rise flexible diaphragm structures”. Engineering Structures, 29, 1375-1397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.021

Chen, Y. and Soong, T.T. (1988). “State-of-the-art review seismic response of secondary systems”. Engineering Structures, 10, 218-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(88)90043-0

Tena-Colunga, A. and Abrams, D.P. (1992). “Response of an unreinforced masonry building during the Loma Prieta earthquake”. Civil Engineering Studies – Structural Research Series No. 576. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Kim, S.-C. and White, D.W. (2003). “MDOF response of low-rise buildings”. Final Report Project ST-5.Mid-America Earthquake Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Sadashiva, V.K., MacRae, G.A., Deam, B.L. and Spooner, M.S. (2012). “Quantifying the seismic response of structures with flexible diaphragms”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(10), 1365-1389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1187

Chopra, A.K. (2007). “Dynamics of structures – theory and applications to earthquake engineering”. 3rd Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Suarez, L.E. and Singh, M.P. (1987). “Seismic response of SDF equipment-structure system”. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 113(1), 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:1(16)

Lay, D.C. (2003). “Linear algebra and its applications”. 3rd Edition. Pearson Education.

Standards Australia (2007). “Structural design actions. Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia”. AS 1170.4-2007. Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.

Krawinkler, H., Parisi, F., Ibarra, L., Ayoub, A. and Medina, A.R. (2000). “Development of a testing protocol for wood frame structures”. CUREE Report Np. W-03. Richmond, CA.

Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A. and Folz, B. (2002). “Seismic response of self-centring hysteretic sdof systems”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 1131-1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.152

Lam, N., Wilson, J. and Venkatesa, S. (2005). “Accelerograms for dynamic analysis under the new Australian Standard for Earthquake Actions”. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 5, 10-35.

New Zealand Standard (2004). “Structural design actions Part 5: Earthquake actions - New Zealand”. NZS 1170.5:2004. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.

New Zealand Standard (2004). “Structural design actions Part 5: Earthquake actions - New Zealand - Commentary”. NZS 1170.5 Supp1:2004. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.

Giongo, I., Wilson, A., Dizhur, D, Derakhshan, H., Tomasi, R., Griffith, M., Quenneville, P. and Ingham, J. (2014). “Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragms”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(2), 97-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.2.97-118

Bruneau, M. (1994). “Seismic evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings – a state-of-the-art report”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(3), 512-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/l94-054

CSI (2012). SAP2000 v15. Computers and Structures Inc. Berkeley, CA.

FEMA (2000). "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings". FEMA 356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

Published
2014-12-31
How to Cite
Nakamura, Y., Derakhshan, H., Ingham, J. M., & Griffith, M. C. (2014). Seismic analysis of in-plane loaded walls in unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(4), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.47.4.275-289
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>