Interpretation and evaluation of NZS1170.5 2016 provisions for seismic ratcheting

Authors

  • Khaled Saif Jacobs, Dallas, Texas
  • Trevor Yeow Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo
  • Chin-Long Lee University of Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Gregory MacRae University of Canterbury, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.55.3.183-198

Abstract

During seismic events, some structures have a tendency to ratchet and displace more in one direction than in the opposite direction after yielding, resulting in larger peak and residual displacements. Provisions to define the tendency for seismic ratcheting and the resulting displacement amplification are provided in the 2016 amendments of NZS1170.5. This paper presents some insight into the factors causing ratcheting, along with interpretation and evaluation of the proposed provisions. Firstly, the mechanics of seismic ratcheting due to dynamic stability, eccentric gravity loads, and unbalanced structural strengths in the back-and-forth directions are discussed. Afterwards, the new provisions were detailed and demonstrated by working through the NZS1170.5 commentary examples. The authors’ interpretation of the provisions is then presented, potential areas of confusion are identified, and wording changes to provide consistency and clarity are proposed. Finally, the displacement amplification factors provided in the 2016 amendments were evaluated using results of an independent study on single-degree-of-freedom reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to eccentric gravity loading. It was found that the displacement amplification method proposed was reasonable, except when columns designed with a high ductility factor or which exhibit inelastic bilinear response had a significant tendency for ratcheting.

References

Ramirez CM and Miranda E (2012). “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(11): 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2217

Kawashima K, MacRae GA and Hasegawa K (1992). “The strength and ductility of steel bridge piers based on load tests”. Journal of Research of the Public Work Research Institute, 29.

Cooper M, Carter R and Fenwick R (2011). “Canterbury Earthquake Royal Commission Final Report Volume 2 – The Performance of Christchurch CBD Buildings”. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, Wellington, New Zealand.

Standards New Zealand (2016). “NZS1170.5:2016 Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand”. Wellington, New Zealand.

MacRae GA and Kawashima K (1993). “The seismic response of bilinear oscillators using Japanese earthquake records”. Journal of Research of the Public Works Research Institute, 30.

Yeow TZ, MacRae GA, Sadashiva VK and Kawashima K (2013). “Dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(5): 750-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.771591

Abolahirad A and MacRae GA (2017). “Dynamically straightening of low-damage steel buildings after earthquake”. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 9-13 Jan 2017.

Alavi B and Krawinkler H (2001). “Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures”. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Standford University, CA, US.

Hamidi Jamnani H, Karbassi A and Lestuzzi P (2013). “Fling-step effect on the seismic behavior of high-rise RC buildings during the Christchurch earthquake”. Proceedings of the 2013 New Zealand Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand, 26-28 April 2013.

Chen L, Zhang N, Jiang L, Zeng Z, Chen G and Guo W (2014). “Near-fault directivity pulse-like ground motion effect on high-speed railway bridge”. Journal of Central South University, 21(6): 2425-2436.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2196-9

Dupuis MR, Best TDD, Elwood KJ and Anderson DL (2014). “Seismic performance of shear wall buildings with gravity-induced lateral demands”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(4): 323-332.

https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0482

National Research Council (2015). “National Building Code of Canada”. National Research Council of Canada, Ontario, Canada.

Japan Road Association (1990). “Design Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V: Seismic Design”. Japan Road Association, Tokyo, Japan.

Takeda T, Sozen MA and Nielsen NN (1970). “Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes”. Journal of the Structural Division, 96(12): 2557-2573. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002765

Priestley MJN, and Kowalsky MJ (1998). “Aspects of drift and ductility capacity of rectangular cantilever structural walls”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(2): 73-85.

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.31.2.73-85

Standards New Zealand (2016b). “NZS1170.5:2016 Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand (Commentary)”. Wellington, New Zealand.

Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand (2002). “NZS1170.0:2002 structural design actions part 0: general principles”, Wellington, New Zealand.

Standards New Zealand (2006). “NZS3101:2006 – The Design of Concrete Structures”. Wellington, New Zealand.

McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH and Jeremic B (2016). “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees)”. University of California, Berkeley, US.

Applied Technology Council (2009). “FEMA P-695: Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors”. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, US.

Saif K, Lee C-L, Yeow T and MacRae G (2018). “Seismic ratchetting of single-degree-of-freedom steel bridge columns”. Key Engineering Materials, 763: 295-300. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.763.295

Downloads

Published

01-09-2022

How to Cite

Saif, K., Yeow, T., Lee, C.-L., & MacRae, G. (2022). Interpretation and evaluation of NZS1170.5 2016 provisions for seismic ratcheting. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 55(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.55.3.183-198

Issue

Section

Articles