A study on sensitivity of seismic site amplification factors to site conditions for bridges
Seismic site amplification factors and seismic design spectra for bridges are influenced by site conditions that include geotechnical properties of soil strata as well as the geological setting. All modern seismic design codes recognize this fact and assign design spectral shapes based on site conditions or specify a 2-parameter model with site amplification factors as a function of site class, seismic intensity and vibration period (short and long). Design codes made a number of assumptions related to the site conditions while specifying the values of short (Fa) and long period (Fv) site amplification factors. Making these assumptions was necessary due to vast variation in site properties and limited availability of actual strong motion records on all site conditions and seismic setting in a region. This paper conducted a sensitivity analysis for site amplification factors for site classes C and D in the AASHTO bridge design code by performing a 1-D site response analysis in which values of site parameters like strata depth, travel-time averaged shear wave velocity in the top 30 m strata (Vs30), plasticity index (PI), impedance contrast ratio (ICR) and intensity of seismic ground motion were varied. The results were analyzed to identify the site parameters that impacted Fa and Fv values for site classes C and D. The computed Fa and Fv values were compared with the corresponding values in the AASHTO bridge design code and it was found that the code-based Fa and Fv values were generally underestimated and overestimated respectively.
Elnashai AS and DiSarno L (2008). “Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering”. Wiley & Sons, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470024867
AASHTO (2014). “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 7th Edition”. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR and Seed RB (2000). “New Site Coefficients and Site Classification System Used in Recent Building Seismic Code Provisions”. Earthquake Spectra, 16(1): 41-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586082
Borcherdt RD (1997). “Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for New and Existing Highway Facilities (Methodology and Justification)”. Proceedings of FHWA/NCEER Workshop on the National Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities, Edited by: IM Friedland, MS Power and RL Mayes, Technical Report NCEER-97-0010, pp. 171-201, Buffalo, NY.
Nikolaou S, Mylonakis G and Edinger P (2001). “Evaluation of Site Factors for Seismic Bridge Design in New York City Area”. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 6(6): 564-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(564)
Kim DS, Chung CK, Sun CG and Bang ES (2002). “Site Assessment and Evaluation of Spatial Earthquake Ground Motion of Kyeongju”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(5): 371-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00023-4
Kalkan E and Gülkan P (2004). “Site-dependent Spectra Derived from Ground Motion Records in Turkey”. Earthquake Spectra, 20(4): 1111-1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1812555
Rathje EM, Kottke AR and Trent WL (2010). “Influence of Input Motion and Site Property Variabilities on Seismic Site Response Analysis”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(4): 607-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000255
Jayaram N, Baker JW, Okano H, Ishida H, McCann Jr. MW and Mihara Y (2011). “Correlation of Response Spectral Values in Japanese Ground Motions”. Earthquake and Structures, 2(4): 357-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.4.357
Andreotti G, Lai GC, Bozzoni F and Scandella L (2013). “New Soil Factors for the Italian Building Code (NTC08) Derived from 1D Fully Stochastic Ground Response Analyses”. XV Convegno ANIDIS, Padova, Italy, Vol. 30.
Dhakal RP, Lin SL, Loye AK and Evans SJ (2013). “Seismic Design Spectra for Different Soil Classes”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 46(2): 79-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.2.79-87
Gautam D, Forte G and Rodrigues H (2016). “Site Effects and Associated Structural Damage Analysis in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal”. Earthquake and Structures, 10: 1013-1032.
Manandhar S, Cho HI and Kim DS (2016). “Effect of Bedrock Stiffness and Thickness of Weathered Rock on Response Spectrum in Korea”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(7): 2677-2691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0811-z
Pitilakis K, Gazepis C and Anastasiadis A (2004). “Design Response Spectra and Soil Classification for Seismic Code Provisions”. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2904, Vancouver, Canada.
Papaspiliou M, Kontoe S and Bommer JJ (2012). “An Exploration of Incorporating Site Response into PSHA—Part I: Issues Related to Site Response Analysis Methods”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 42: 302-315.
European Committee for Standardization (2003). “Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings”. Brussels, 232 pp.
Japan Road Association (2012). “Design Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V: Seismic Design”. Japan Road Association, Tokyo, Japan.
Standards New Zealand (2002). “AS/NZS 1170.0: Structural Design Actions, Part 0: General Principles”. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Fukushima Y, Bonilla LF, Scotti O and Douglas J (2007). “Site Classification Using Horizontal-to-Vertical Response Spectral Ratios and its Impact When Deriving Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11(5): 712-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701457116
Kouretzis GP, Masia MJ and Allen C (2013). “Structural Design Codes of Australia and New Zealand: Seismic Actions”. In: Beer M, Kougioumtzoglou I, Patelli E, Au IK (editors), Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Douglas J, Gehl P, Bonilla LF, Scotti O, Régnier J, Duval AM and Bertrand E (2009). “Making the Most of Available Site Information for Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(3): 1502-1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080075
Toro GR (1995). “Probabilistic Models of Site Velocity Profiles for Generic and Site-Specific Ground-Motion Amplification Studies”. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York.
Chaudhary MTA (2017). “Seismic Response of Bridges Supported on Shallow Rock Foundations Considering SSI and Pier Column Inelasticity”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1): 285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0352-5
Bieniawski ZT (1974). “Geomechanics Classification of Rock Masses and its Application in Tunneling”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Rock Mechanics, ISRM, Denver, 2(2): 27-32.
Kottke AR and Rathje EM (2008). “Technical Manual for Strata”. PEER Report 2008/10. University of California, Berkeley, California, http://nees.org/resources/strata.
Burmister DM (1949). “Principles and Techniques of Soil Identification”. Proceedings of 29th Annual Highway Research Board meeting, National Research Council, Washington, DC. pp. 402-433.
Guerreiro P, Kontoe S and Taborda D (2012). “Comparative Study of Stiffness Reduction and Damping Curves”. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, CD ROM, pp. 1-10.
Darendeli MB (2001). “Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping Curves”. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 394 pp.
Vucetic M and Dobry R (1991). “Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1): 87-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
Ishibashi I and Zhang X (1993). “Unified Dynamic Shear Moduli and Damping Ratios of Sand and Clay”. Soils and Foundations, 33(1), 182-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.182
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2008). “ATC-63: Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors”. ATC-63, Project Report prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009). “FEMA P-750. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures”. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Haselton CB, Baker JW, Stewart JP, Whittaker AS, Luco N, Fry A and Pekelnicky RG (2017). “Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Standard: Part I-Overview and Specification of Ground Motions”. Earthquake Spectra, 33(2): 373-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/032114EQS039M
Katsanos EI and Sextos AG (2013). “ISSARS: An Integrated Software Environment for Structure-Specific Earthquake Ground Motion Selection”. Advances in Engineering Software, 58: 70-85.
Stewart JP, Afshari K and Hashash YM (2014). “Guidelines for Performing Hazard-Consistent One-Dimensional Ground Response Analysis for Ground Motion Prediction”. PEER Report, 2014/16, Berkeley, CA.
Chaudhary MTA (2016). “Implication of Soil and Seismic Ground Motion Variability on Dynamic Pile Group Impedance for Bridges”. Project Report No. EV01/15, Research Sector, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Pacific Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (2017). “PEER NGA-West2 Ground Motion Database”. Pacific Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Berkeley, CA. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
Dhakal RP, Lin SL, Loye AK and Evans SJ (2013). “Closure to Seismic Design Spectra for Different Soil Classes”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 46(4): 222-225.
Seed HB, Ugas C and Lysmer J (1976). “Site-Dependent Spectra for Earthquake-Resistant Design”. Bulletin of the Seismological society of America, 66(1): 221-243.
Borcherdt RD (1994). “Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification)”. Earthquake Spectra, 10(4): 617-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585791
Rey J, Faccioli E and Bommer JJ (2002). “Derivation of Design Soil Coefficient(s) and Response Spectral Shapes for Eurocode 8 Using the European Strong-Motion Database”. Journal of Seismology, 6(4): 547-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021169715992
Pitilakis K, Riga E and Anastasiadis A (2013). “New Code Site Classification, Amplification Factors and Normalized Response Spectra Based on a Worldwide Ground-Motion Database”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(4): 925-966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9429-4
Borcherdt RD (1996). “Preliminary Amplification Estimates Inferred from Strong Ground Motion Recordings of the Northridge Earthquake Of January 17, 1994”. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Site Response Subjected to Strong Ground Motion, edited by Iai, Yokosuka, Japan, Vol. 2, pp. 21-46.
Dobry R, Ramos R and Power MS (1999). “Site Factor and Site Categories in Seismic Codes”. Technical Report MCEER- 99-0010, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Building Seismic Safety Council (1997). “FEMA 302/303, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1 (Provisions) and Part 2 (Commentary)”. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.
Roesset JM (1977). “Soil Amplification in Earthquakes”. Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, Edited by C.S. Desai and J.T. Christian, Chapter 19, McGraw Hill, NY, 639-682.
Devore J and Farnum N (2013). “Applied Statistics for Engineers and Scientists”. 2nd Edition, Cengage Learning, Toronto.
Kim B, Hashash YMA, Stewart JP, Rathje EM, Harmon JA, Musgrove MI, Campell KW and Silva WJ (2016). “Relative Differences between Nonlinear and Equivalent-Linear 1D Site Response Analyses”. Earthquake Spectra, 32(3): 1845-1865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/051215EQS068M
Kaklamanos J, Baise LG, Thompson EM and Dorfmann L (2015). “Comparison of 1D Linear, Equivalent-Linear, and Nonlinear Site Response Models at Six Kik-Net Validation Sites”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 69: 207-219.
Bolisetti, C, Whittaker AS, Mason HB, Almufti I and Willford M (2014). “Equivalent Linear and Nonlinear Site Response Analysis for Design and Risk Assessment of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures”. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 275: 107-121.