Assessment of material strain limits for defining plastic regions in concrete structures
The New Zealand Structural Loadings Standard, until its latest revision, used the structural ductility factor as a measure of the deformation demand of all potential plastic hinges in a structure. In the new version of New Zealand Standard for Earthquake Actions (NZS 1170.5:2004) the detailing of potential plastic regions is determined according to the local deformation demand in these regions. The change has been prompted by evidence that the structural ductility factor gives a poor indication of the demand on individual plastic regions. This new approach has also been adopted by the revised New Zealand Concrete Structures Standard (NZS 3101:2006) which classifies potential plastic regions into three categories (namely ductile, limited ductile and nominally ductile) based upon their inelastic deformation demand specified in terms of material strain limits. The material strain limits currently set in NZS 3101:2006 for the three categories of plastic regions are based on limited experimental evidence and need a closer revision. This paper tries to obtain more justifiable values of material strain limits based on experimental data. In this research, reversed cyclic loading tests of beams are conducted to compensate for a lack of data in the nominally ductile range of detailing. Based on the results of the tests conducted, curvature limits for nominally ductile plastic hinges are derived. Combining the experimental results collected from literature and the tests conducted in this project, updated material strain limits for the three categories of plastic regions are proposed. To unify the design process for all types of plastic regions, curvature limits for nominally ductile plastic hinges are also proposed as the multiple of first yield curvature (similar to the existing approach for the other two categories of plastic regions) rather than the existing approach of specifying allowable compressive (concrete) and tensile (rebar) strain limits for nominally ductile plastic regions. To further simplify the process, the representative value of first yield curvature is approximated as two times the yielding strain to the beam height ratio, thereby relieving the designers from having to conduct section analysis to estimate neutral axis depth.
SANZ, (1992), General Structural Design and Design Loadings for Buildings Standard, NZS 4203:1992. Standards Association, Wellington, NZ.
SANZ, (1995), Concrete Structures Standard, NZS 3101:1995. Standards Association, Wellington, NZ.
Dhakal, R.P. and Fenwick, R.C., (2008), “Detailing of Plastic Hinges in Seismic Design of Concrete Structures”. ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 105, No. 6, pp 740-749.
SANZ, (2004), Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions, New Zealand, NZS 1170.5:2004. Standards Association, Wellington, NZ.
SANZ, (2006), Concrete Structures Standard, NZS 3101:2006. Standards Association, Wellington, NZ.
Fenwick R.C. and Davidson B., (1987), “Moment Redistribution in Seismic Resistant Concrete Frames”, Proceedings of the Pacific Conference for Earthquake Engineering, Wairakei, NZ, Vol. 1, pp 95-106.
Fenwick R.C, Dely R. and Davidson B., (1999), “Ductility Demand for Uni-directional and Reversing Plastic Hinges in Ductile Moment Resisting Frames”, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.32.1.1-12
Fenwick R.C. and Dhakal R.P., (2007a), Material Strains and Relevance to Seismic Design, SESOC Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp 5-12.
Fenwick R.C. and Dhakal R.P., (2007b), “Material Strain Limits for Seismic Design of Concrete Structures”, SESOC Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp 14-28.
Zhao J. and Sritharan S., (2007), “Modelling of Strain Penetration Effects in Fibre-Based Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp 133-141.
Walker A.W., (2008), Assessment of Material Strain Limits for Defining Different Forms of Plastic Regions in Concrete Structures, Masters Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.
Priestley M.J.N. and Kowalsky M.J., (2000), “Direct Displacement Based Design of Concrete Buildings”, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp 421-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.4.421-444
Fang I.K., Yen S.T., Wang C.S. and Hong K.L., (1993), “Cyclic Behaviour of Moderately Deep HSC Beams”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp 2573-2591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:9(2573)
Fang I.K., Wang C.S. and Hong K.L., (1994), “Cyclic Behaviour of High Strength Concrete Short Beams with Lower Amount of Flexural Reinforcement”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp 10-18.
Salonikios T.N., (2001), “Shear Strength and Deformation Patterns of R/C Walls with Aspect Ratio 1.0 and 1.5 Designed to Eurocode 8”, Engineering Structures, Vol.24, No. 1, pp 39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00076-1
Greifenhagen C. and Lestuzzi P., (2005), “Static Cyclic Tests on Lightly Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp 1703-1712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.008
Copyright (c) 2009 Adam F. Walker, Rajesh P. Dhakal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.