Seismic loss estimation for efficient decision making
In order to incorporate seismic risk of facilities into a decision making framework, procedures are needed to quantify such risk for stakeholders. Seismic loss estimation methods combine seismic hazard, structural response, damage fragility, and damage consequences to allow quantification of seismic risk. This paper presents a loss estimation methodology which provides various measures of seismic risk for a specific facility. The methodology is component-based and can therefore distinguish between different structural configurations or different facility contents and is consistent with state-of-the-art loss assessment procedures. Loss is measured in the forms of direct structural and non-structural repair costs, and although not considered in the example, business disruption and occupant injuries can also be considered. This framework has been packaged in a computer code available for future dissemination in the public domain so that users need only to have a basic understanding of the methodology and the input data that is required. Discussion is given to the flexibility of the framework in terms of the rigour which can be employed at each of the main steps in the procedure. Via a case study of a high-rise office building, the use of the methodology in decision-making is illustrated. Methodological requirements and further research directions are discussed.
Insurance Information Institute. (2006), "Earthquakes: Facts and Statistics".
Bull, D. K. and Brunsdon, D. (1998), "Examples of Concrete Structural Design to New Zealand Standards 3101". New Zealand.
Standards New Zealand. (1995), "NZS 3101 1995: Part 1: Concrete Structures Standard". Wellington, NZpp.
Standards New Zealand. (2004), "NZS 1170.5:2004". Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Carr, A. J. (2004), "Ruaumoko: Inelastic Dynamic Computer Program". Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Stirling, M. W., McVerry, G. H. and Berryman, K. R. (2002), "A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 92 (5): 1878–1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010156
Shome, N. and Cornell, C. A. (1999), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures". Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 357pp. www.stanford.edu/group/rms/
Medina, R. A. and Krawinkler, H. (2003), "Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions". John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 373 pppp.
Moghadam, A. S. and Tso, W. K. (2000), "Pushover analysis for asymmetric and set-back multi-story buildings", in Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 1093.pp.
Fajfar, P. (2002), "Structural analysis in earthquake engineering – A breakthrough of simplified nonlinear methods", in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK.pp.
Penelis, G. G. and Kappos, A. J. (2002), "3D pushover analysis: The issue of torsion", in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UKpp.
Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 33 903–927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380
Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 31 (3): 491–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
Aslani, H. and Miranda, E. (2005), "Probability-based Seismic Response Analysis". Engineering Structures. 27 (8): 1151-1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.015
Mander, J. B., Dhakal, R. P., Mashiko, N. and Solberg, K. M. (2007), "Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges". Engineering Structures. 29 (10): 2662-2672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.015
Ang, A. H. S. and Tang, W. H. (1975), "Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design " vol. Volume I – Basic Principles. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 406pp.
Jalayer, F. (2003), "Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments". Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, 173 pppp.
Shome, N. and Cornell, C. A. (2000), "Structural seismic demand analysis: Consideration of "Collapse"", in 8th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, 7pp.
Aslani, H. (2005), "Probabilistic Earthquake Loss Estimation and Loss Disaggregation in Buildings". Ph.D. Thesis, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, 382 pppp.
Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2007), "Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 36 (13): 1901-1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702
Elwood, K. J. and Moehle, J. P. (2008), "Dynamic Collapse Analysis for a Reinforced Concrete Frame Sustaining Shear and Axial Failures". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. (in press) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.787
Ibarra, L. F. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations". University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2007), "An Ounce of Prevention: Probabilistic Loss Estimation for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering". Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of technology, 173pp.
Buchan, J. (2007), "Internal report of non-structural and contents inventories for the Christchurch Council Chambers building". Christchurch, New Zealand.
Taghavi, S. and Miranda, E. (2005), "Response assessment of non-structural building elements". http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports.html
Bradley, B. A. (2008), "SLAT: Seismic Loss Assessment Tool, version 1.12 user manual". Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 109pp.
Porter, K., Kennedy, R. and Bachman, R. (2007), "Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering". Earthquake Spectra. 23 (2): 471-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892
Cousins, J. and McVerry, G. (2007), "Ground motion spectra for the 2007 Gisborne earthquake".
Porter, K. A., Kiremidjian, A. S. and LeGrue, J. S. (2001), "Assembly-Based Vulnerability for Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation". Earthquake Spectra. 17 (2): 291-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586176
Boissonnade, A. (2007), "Modelling demand surge". Workshop on Risk Acceptance and Risk Communication, Stanford University, CA.
Yeo, G. L. and Cornell, C. A. (2005), "Stochastic Characterisation and Decision Bases under Time-Dependent Aftershock Risk in Performance-based Earthquake Engineering". John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre, Stanford University., CA.
Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R. and Pampanin, S. (1999), "Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-storey precast concrete test building". PCI Journal. 44 (6): 42–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67
Mander, J. B. and Cheng, C. T. (1997), "Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design". National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Copyright (c) 2009 Brendon A. Bradley, Rajesh P. Dhakal, Misko Cubrinovski, Gregory A. MacRae, Dominic S. Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.