Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103

Abstract

During the past two decades, the focus has been on the need to provide communities with structures that undergo minimal damage after an earthquake event while still being cost competitive. This has led to the development of high performance seismic resisting systems, and advances in design methodologies, in order respect this demand efficiently.

This paper presents the experimental response of four pre-cast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems tested on the shake-table at the University of Canterbury. The wall systems were designed as a retrofit solution for an existing frame building, but are equally applicable for use in new design. Design of the wall followed a performance-based retrofit strategy in which structural limit states appropriate to both the post-tensioned wall and the existing building were considered.

Dissipation for each of the four post-tensioned walls was provided via externally mounted devices, located in parallel to post-tensioned tendons for re-centring. This allowed the dissipation devices to be easily replaced or inspected following a major earthquake. Each wall was installed with viscous fluid dampers, tension-compression yielding steel dampers, a combination of both or no devices at all – thus relying on contact damping alone. The effectiveness of both velocity and displacement dependant dissipation are investigated for protection against far-field and velocity-pulse ground motion characteristics.

The experimental results validate the behaviour of ‘Advanced Flag-Shape’ rocking, dissipating solutions which have been recently proposed and numerically tested. Maximum displacements and material strains were well controlled and within acceptable bounds, and residual deformations were minimal due to the re-centring contribution from the post tensioned tendons. Damage was confined to inelastic yielding (or fluid damping) of the external dampers.

References

ACI:T1.2-03. (2007). ACI Manual of Concrete Practice-Special Hybrid Moment Frames Composed of Discretely Jointed Precast and Post-Tensioned Concrete Members.

ASCE. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356). Reston, Virginia: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

BSSC. (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273). Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

BSSC. (2003). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450). Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Chase, J. G., Hudson, N. H., Lin, J., Elliot, R. & Sim, A. (2005). Nonlinear Shake Table Identification and Control for near-Field Earthquake Testing, Journal of Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 461-482. July 2005.

fib. (2003a). Displacement Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.

fib. (2003b). Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.

fib. (2003c). Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.

Holden, T. J. (2001). A Comparison of the Seismic Performance of Precast Wall Construction: Emulation and Hybrid Approaches. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

Kam, W. Y., Pampanin, S., Carr, A. J. & Palermo, A. (2007). Advanced Flag-Shape Systems for High Seismic Performance including Near-Fault Effects, NZSEE Annual Conference 2007, Palmerston North.

Kurama, Y. C. (2000). Seismic design of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls with supplemental viscous damping, ACI Structural Journal, Vol 97(4) 648-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/7431

Kurama, Y. C. (2002). Hybrid post-tensioned precast concrete walls for use in seismic regions, PCI Journal, Vol 47(5) 36-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012002.36.59

Kurama, Y. C., Pessiki, S., Sause, R., Lu, L. & El-Sheikh, M. T. (1998a). Analytical Modelling and Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls. Lehigh University.

Kurama, Y. C., Sause, R., Lu, L. & Pessiki, S. (1999). Seismic Behaviour and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls, PCI Journal, Vol 44(3) 72-89.

Kurama, Y. C., Sause, R., Pessiki, S., Lu, L. & El-Sheikh, M. T. (1998b). Seismic Design and Response Evaluation of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls. Lehigh University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.72.89

Mander, J. B. & Cheng, C.-T. (1997). Seismic Resistance of Bridge Piers Based on Damage Avoidance Design. New York: University of Buffalo.

Marriott, D., Pampanin, S. & Bull, D. (2007a). Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings using Advanced Rocking Wall Solutions, NZSEE 2007 Annual Conference, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Marriott, D., Pampanin, S. & Palermo, A. (2007b). Seismic Design, Experimental Response and Numerical Modelling of Rocking Bridge Piers with Hybrid, Post-Tensioned Connections. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

Mueller, P. (1986). Hysteretic Behaviour of Precast Panel Walls, U.S.-Japan Seminar on Precast Concrete Construction in Seismic Zones, Tokyo, Japan.

NZS3101. (2006). Concrete Structures Standard: Part 1-The Design of Concrete Structures. Wellington: Standards New Zealand.

NZSEE. (2005). Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquake. Department of Building and Housing.

Palermo, A., Pampanin, S. & Calvi, G. M. (2005). Concept and Development of Hybrid Solutions fro Seismic Resistant Bridge Systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol 9(5) 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350571

Pampanin, S. (2005). Emerging solutions for high seismic performance of precast/prestressed concrete buildings, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol 3(2) 207-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.3.207

Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M. & Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. Pavia: IUSS.

Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R. & Pampanin, S. (1999). Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building, PCI Journal, Vol 44(6) 42-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67

Rahman, A. M. & Restrepo, J. I. (2000). Earthquake Resistant Precast Concrete Buildings: Seismic Performance of Cantilever Walls Prestressed Using Unbonded Tendons. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

SEAOC. (1999). Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary. Structural Engineers Association of California.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2008

How to Cite

Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., Bull, D., & Palermo, A. (2008). Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories