Effectiveness of earthquake selection and scaling method in New Zealand

  • Rajesh P. Dhakal University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5524-5919
  • Sandip Singh University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • John B. Mander Texas A&M University, College Station, USA

Abstract

In New Zealand, time history analysis is either the required or preferred method of assessing seismic demands for torsionally sensitive and other important structures, but the criteria adopted for the selection of ground motion records and their scaling to generate the seismic demand remains a contentious and debatable issue. In this paper, the scaling method based on the least squares fit of response spectra between 0.4-1.3 times the structure’s first mode period as stipulated in the New Zealand Standard for Structural Design Actions: Earthquake Actions (NZS1170.5) [1] is compared with the scaling methods in which ground motion records are scaled to match the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration response at the natural period of the structure corresponding to the first mode with 5% of critical damping; i.e. Sa(T1, 5%). Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is used to measure the record-to-record randomness of structural response, which is also a measure of the efficiency of the intensity measure (IM) used. Comparison of the dispersions of IDA curves with the three different IMs; namely PGA, Sa(T1, 5%) and NZS1170.5 based IM, shows that the NZS1170.5 scaling method is the most effective for a large suite of ground motions. Nevertheless, the use of only three randomly chosen ground motions as presently permitted by NZS1170.5 is found to give significantly low confidence in the predicted seismic demand. It is thus demonstrated that more records should be used to provide a robust estimate of likely seismic demands.

References

NZS1170.5. (2004). New Zealand Standard, Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand. Standards New Zealand, Wellington.

Krawinkler, H. and Miranda, E. (2004). Performance-based earthquake engineering. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, Edited by Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Dhakal, R.P. and Mander, J.B. (2006). Financial risk assessment methodology for natural hazards. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 39(2):91-105.

Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J.E. (1998). Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 14(3):469-500.

Mander, J.B, Dhakal, R.P, Mashiko, N. and Solberg, K.M. (2007). Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Engineering Structures doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.015 (In Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.015

Abrahamson, N.A. and Silva, W.J. (1997). Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68:94-127.

Shome, N. and Cornell, C.A. (1999). Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Cornell, C.A. and Luco, N. (1999). The effects of connection fractures on steel moment resisting frame seismic demand and safety: A report on SAC Phase II task 5.4.6. Report No. SAC/BD-99/03, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, California.

Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2007). Structure-specific scalar intensity measure for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 23(2):357-392.

Tothong, P. and Luco, N. (2007). Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (In Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.696

Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2005). A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34(10):1193-1217.

Luco, N. (20020. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis, SMRF connection fractures, and near source effects. PhD Thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California.

Singh, S. (2006). Earthquake Record Selection for Time History Analysis. ME Project Report, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury.

Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (20020. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31(3):491-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141

Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2004). Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 20(2):523-553.

Carr, A.J. (2004). RUAUMOKO 2D: Inelastic Dynamic Computer Program. Computer Program Library, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2005). Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34(13):1573-1600.

Benjamin, J.R. and Cornell, C.A. (1970). Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Iervolino, I. and Cornell, C.A. (2005). Record selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 21(3):685-713.

Dhakal, R.P., Mander, J.B. and Mashiko, N. (2006). Identification of critical ground motions for seismic performance assessment of structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 35(8):989-1008.

Published
2007-09-30
How to Cite
Dhakal, R. P., Singh, S., & Mander, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of earthquake selection and scaling method in New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 40(3), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.40.3.160-171
Section
Articles