Earthquake risk reduction actions for New Zealand
This paper discusses what we already do and what extra should be done lo reduce earthquake risk in New Zealand. Some of the needed actions have been learned from the consequences, good as well as bad, of earthquakes that have occurred both in New Zealand and in other parts of the world. A list of 26 weaknesses are identified in New Zealand's systems of earthquake risk reduction. Remedial actions to overcome these weaknesses in a balanced way involve at least nine parties. Fifteen of the weaknesses have five or more parties who could or should take some remedial action over them. Engineers have technical actions to address 20 of the weaknesses, while earthquake-related professions have an advocacy role to play in all of them. The potential exists for reducing earthquake losses by about an order of magnitude, i.e. worth billions of dollars and thousands of casualties in future earthquakes.
Beattie, G.J. (2000), The design of building services for earthquake resistance. Paper No. 2462, Proc 12th World Conf on Earthq Eng, Auckland (CD Rom).
Dowrick, D.J. (2003), Earthquake risk reduction. John Wiley & Sons. Chichester. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470869356
Dowrick D.J. and Rhoades D.A. (1997), Inferences for design, insurance and planning from damage evaluation in past New Zealand earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1): 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962362
Dowrick D.J., Rhoades D.A. and Davenport P.N. (2001), Damage ratios for domestic property in the magnitude 7.2 1968 Inangahua, New Zealand, earthquake. Bull NZ Soc for Earthq Eng, 34(3): 191-213.
Dowrick, D.J., Rhoades, D.A. and Davenport, P.N. (2003), Effects of microzoning and foundations for domestic property in the magnitude 7.2 Inangahua, New Zealand, earthquake of 1968. Bull NZ Soc for Earthq Eng, 36(1): 25-46.
Dowrick, D.J., Rhoades, D.A., Babor, J. and Beetham, R.D. (1995), Damage ratios and microzoning effects for houses in Napier at the centre of the magnitude 7.8 Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, earthquake of 1931. Bull NZ Nat Soc for Earthq Eng, 28(2): 134-45.
EERI (2002), Arresting the growth of earthquake vulnerability: Needs and opportunities for earthquake engineering. Draft Plan for Review by EERI membership. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, California.
Hopkins, D.C. (2002), NZSEE Earthquake Risk Buildings Study Group. Technical Conf NZ Soc for Earthq Eng, Napier, Paper 5.6.
IPENZ (2003), Report of the structural taskforce enquiring into the state of structural engineering in New Zealand. The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand Inc.
King, A., Brunsdon D., Shephard, B., Km, J. and Van Dissen, R. (2003), Building adjacent to active faults: a risk-based approach. Proc. 7th Pacific Conf on Earthq Eng., Christchurch (CD Rom, Paper 158).
Mander, J.B. (2001), Future directions in seismic design and performance-based engineering. Technical Conference of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wairakei, Paper 2.01.
NZSEE Study Group (2000), An initial evaluation process for identifying buildings not safe in earthquake. Recommendations of the NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings, prepared for the Building Industry Authority, Draft 8.
NZNSEE Study Group (1996), The assessment and improvement of the structural performance of earthquake risk buildings. NZ Nat Soc for Earthq Eng. Draft for General Release, prepared for the Building Industry Authority.
NZS 4219 (1983), Specification for seismic resistance of engineering systems in buildings. Standards Association of New Zealand, Wellington.
Scarry, J. (2002), An open letter to IPENZ regarding the parlous state of the structural engineering profession and the construction industry in New Zealand. John Scarry (December), 141 pp.
Shipp, J.G. and Johnson, M.W. (1990), Seismic loss estimation for non-structural components in high-rise buildings. Proc 4th US Nat Conf on Earthq Eng, EERI, Oakland, California.
Smith, W. (2003), Criteria for strengthening buildings: cost-benefit analysis is misleading. Bull NZ Soc for Earthq Eng., 36 (4), 260-262 (this issue). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.36.4.260-262
Spence, R.J.S., Pomonis, A., Dowrick, D.J. and Cousins, W.J. (1998), Estimating human casualties in earthquakes: The case of Wellington. In Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Booth (ed), Balkema, Rotterdam, 277-86.
Van Dissen, R. and 13 others (2003), An interim classification of New Zealand's active faults for the mitigation of surface rupture hazard. Proc 7th Pacific Conf on Earthq Eng, Christchurch (CD Rom, Paper 155).
Copyright (c) 2003 David J. Dowrick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.