Understanding torsional phenomena in ductile systems
Recent studies provided opportunities to review some of the principles, which have been used in the formulations of internationally accepted code-recommendations relevant to the seismic design of ductile buildings also subjected to torsional phenomena. With the progress of this study, features emerged which are considered to have contributed to a better understanding of structural behaviour. Moreover, the identification of deeply embedded fallacies, relevant to ductile response, suggested the introduction of some changes in seismic design strategies, yet not widely known or appreciated. Reasons for necessary re-interpretations of traditional structural properties, together with illustrative examples, demonstrating applications, rather than set code-type rules, are offered.
Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings (1996), New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, “The assessment and improvement of the structural performance of earthquake risk buildings”, A draft report for general release, pp. 127.
Paulay, T. (1996), "Seismic design for torsional response of ductile buildings'', Bulletin of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 3, September, pp. 178-198.
Paulay, T. (1997), "A review of code provisions for torsional seismic effects in buildings", Bulletin of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 3, September, pp. 252-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.30.3.252-263
Paulay, T. (1998), "Mechanisms of ductile building systems as affected by torsion", Proceedings NZNSEE Technical Conference, Wairakei, pp. 11-118.
Paulay, T. (1997), "Displacement-based design approach to earthquake-induced torsion in ductile buildings", Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 699-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00167-3
International Association for Earthquake Engineering (1996), "Regulations for seismic design - A world list", Tokyo.
Priestley, M.J.N. (1995), "Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering - Conflicts between design and reality", American Concrete Institute (SP-157), Recent Development in Lateral Force Transfer in Buildings, pp. 231-254.
Paulay, T. and Restrepo, J.I. (1998), "Displacement and ductility compatibility in buildings with mixed structural systems", Journal of the New Zealand Structural Engineering Society, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 7-12.
Paulay, T. (1998), "A mechanism-based design strategy for torsional seismic response of ductile buildings", European Earthquake Engineering, No. 2, pp. 33-48.
Paulay, T. (1999), "Some principles relevant to the seismic torsional response of ductile buildings", Proceedings of the second European workshop on the seismic behaviour of Asymmetric and Irregular Structures, Istanbul, Vol. l, pp. 1-25.
Paulay, T. (2000), "A simple displacement compatibility-based design strategy for reinforced concrete buildings", Proceedings of the, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, N.Z., CD-ROM paper No. 0062.
Standards New Zealand (1992), "Code of practice for general structural design and design loadings for buildings", NZS 4203: 1992, Wellington.
Park, R. and Paulay, T. (1975), "Reinforced Concrete Structures", John Wiley &Sons, New York, pp. 769.
Priestley, MJ.N. and Kowalsky, MJ. (1998), "Aspects of drift and ductility capacity of rectangular structural walls", Bulletin of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 2, June, pp. 73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.31.2.73-85
Priestley, MJ.N. (1998) "Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and significance to seismic design", Bulletin of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 4, December, pp. 246-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.31.4.246-259
Standards New Zealand (1995), "Concrete Structures Standard, design of concrete structures", NZS 3101: 1995, Wellington.
Paulay, T. (1997), "Are existing torsional provisions achieving the design aims" Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 699-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585945
Rutenberg, A. (1992), "Nonlinear response of asymmetric building structures; a state of the art review", Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Editors, Fajfar, P. and Krwinkler, H., Elsevier Applied Science, Amsterdam, pp. 281-305.
Rutenberg, A., Chandler, A.M,, Duan, X.N. and Correnza, J.C. (1995), ''Nonlinear seismic response of asymmetric structures: Bibliography, National Building Research Institute. Israel, pp. 21.
Paulay. T. (1998), ·Torsional mechanisms in ductile building systems", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27. pp. 1101-1121.
La Llera, J. De. and Chopra, A. (1995 ), ··understanding of inelastic seismic behaviour of asymmetric-plan buildings", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 24, pp. 549-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240407
Dusicka, P. and Davidson, BJ. (1999) "Comparative analyses of the response of single storey torsionally unrestrained ductile systems", Journal of the Structural Engineering Society New Zealand. Vol. 12. No. 2, September, pp. 13-19.
Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992). "Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings", John Wiley & Sons. New York, pp. 767.
Humar, J.L. and Kumar, P. (1999). "Effect of orthogonal inplane structural elements on inelastic torsional response", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynmnics, Vol. 28. pp. 1071-1097.
Copyright (c) 2000 Tom Paulay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.