A decade of progress since the Edgecumbe earthquake

Risk and insurance

Authors

  • R. Bruce Shephard Opus International Consultants, Wellington, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.30.2.185-193

Abstract

The 2 March 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake of magnitude (ML) 6.3 resulted in a total loss of some NZ$430M and an insured loss of about NZ$330, (non inflation adjusted). Coupled with other world wide natural disasters resulting in large loss costs, particularly insurance costs, the Edgecumbe earthquake contributed to increasing international costs from natural hazards. As well as putting increasing demands on the world insurance markets it also drew attention of insurers to the potential of earthquake loss in New Zealand. With insurance at higher premium rates, and in some situations difficult to obtain cover, there developed increasing demand for loss assessments and risk management applications. The basic development of earthquake loss methodologies had been established in the early 1980's. Developments of the decade following the Edgecumbe earthquake have focused on refinement of these methods, research and collection of data, applications of computer systems, and extensions to other applications.

References

Smith WD, (1990), Earthquake Hazard in New Zealand; Some Implications of the Edgecumbe Earthquake, March 1987, Bulletin of NZNSEE, Vol 23, No 3, September 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.23.3.211-219

Birss GR, (1985), Methodology for the Assessment of the Damage Cost Resulting From a Large Earthquake in the Vicinity of Wellington, Bulletin of NZNSEE, Vol. 18, No 3 September 1985.

Darwin DJ, (1980), Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Wellington, Report 80/1, Department of Civil Engineering University of Canterbury.

EERI Committee on Seismic Risk,.(1989), The Basics of Seismic Risk Analysis, Earthquake Spectra, Vol 5, No 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585549

FEMA, (1994), Assessment o f the State-of the Art Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodologies, FEMA-249.

King SA, Kiremidjian AS, (1994), Regional Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis Through Geographic Information Systems, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.

Aggett G, (1994), A GIS Based Assessment o f Seismic Risk for Wellington City, Thesis, Geography Department, Auckland University.

Dowrick DJ, Rhoades DA, Babor J, Beetham RD, (1995), Damage Ratios for Houses and Microzoning Effects in Napier in the Magnitude 7.8 Hawkes Bay Earthquake of 1931, Bulletin NZNSEE Vol 28, No 2, June 1995.

Jones BJ, Chang SE, (1994), A Comparison of Indirect and Direct Estimates of the Built Physical Environment in the Memphis Region, Fifth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

King S, Kiremidjian A, Rojahn C, Scholl R, Wilson R, Reaveley L, (1994), Development of Integrated Structural Inventory for Earthquake Loss Estimation, Fifth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Institute o f Building Sciences, USA, (1996), Development of a Standardized Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, FEMA, NIBS, Risk Management Solutions.

Cret L, Katayama T, (1992), On Line Damage Estimation of Lifeline Systems During Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering 10th World Conference, 1992 Balkema, Rotterdam.

Yamazaki, Katayama, Yoshikawa, (1994), On-Line Damage Assessment of City Gas Networks Based on Dense Earthquake Monitoring, Fifth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1994.

Okada S, (1992), Indoor Zonation Map on Dwelling Space Safety During an Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering, 10th World Conference. 1992, Balkema, Rotterdam.

Steinbrugge KV, (1989), Loss Estimation for Earthquake Insurance Purposes: United States Practices, Information Needs Of the Earthquake Insurance Industry in New Zealand, Christchurch, November 1989, EQC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.4.193-198

Downloads

Published

30-06-1997

How to Cite

Shephard, R. B. . (1997). A decade of progress since the Edgecumbe earthquake: Risk and insurance. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 30(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.30.2.185-193