An application of capacity design philosophy to gravity load dominated ductile reinforced concrete frames

Authors

  • T. Paulay University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.11.1.50-61

Abstract

Indiscriminate application of the capacity design philosophy can lead to unnecessary or indeed absurd conservatism in the earthquake resistant design of gravity load dominated ductile reinforced concrete frames. Low-rise framed buildings are typical examples. The origin of excessive potential strength with respect to lateral loading is discussed and proposals are made to establish an acceptable upper bound for lateral load carrying capacity in such frames. A technique is presented by which the successive formation of potential plastic hinges, involving partial beam sway mechanisms, can be conveniently assured. While retaining the requirements for energy dissipation in beams, it is postulated that at an acceptable high level of lateral loading the formation of storey mechanisms, necessary to complete the frame sway mechanism, should be tolerable. Examples are given to illustrate the determination of design quantities for bending moments, shear and axial forces for both, beams and columns.

References

Smith, I. C. and Sidwell, G. K., "Seismic Design of Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced Concrete Frames - Beam Flexure and Hinge Zone Detailing in Reinforced Concrete Ductile Frames Requiring Beam Sway Mechanisms", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1977 , pp. 72-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.10.2.72-79

NZS 4203:1976, New Zealand Standard Code of Practice for General Structural Design and Design Loading for Buildings, Standards Association of New Zealand, 80pp.

Paulay, T., "Moment Redistribution in Continuous Beams of Earthquake Resistant Multistorey Reinforced Concrete Frames", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, Dec. 1976, pp. 205-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.9.4.205-212

Park, R. and Paulay, T., "Reinforced Concrete Structures", John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975, 669pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172834

ACI Committee 318, "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-71)", American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1977, 78pp.

Paulay, T., "Seismic Design of Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced Concrete Frames - Columns - Evaluation of Actions", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1977, pp.86-94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.10.2.85-94

Park, R., "Seismic Design of Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced Concrete Frames - Columns Subjected to Flexure and Axial Load", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1977, pp.95-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.10.2.95-101

Paulay, T., "Seismic Design of Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced Concrete Frames - Shear Strength Requirements", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1977, pp.80-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.10.2.80-84

Burns, R. J., "Seismic Design of Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced Concrete Frames - Introduction and Philosophy", Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1977, pp.69-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.11.2.121

Downloads

Published

31-03-1978

How to Cite

Paulay, T. (1978). An application of capacity design philosophy to gravity load dominated ductile reinforced concrete frames. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 11(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.11.1.50-61

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories