Design of base-isolated buildings
An overview of international codes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.48.2.118-135Abstract
Base isolation is arguably the most reliable method for providing enhanced protection of buildings against earthquake-induced actions, by virtue of a physical separation between the structure and the ground through elements/devices with controlled force capacity, significant lateral deformation capacity and (often) enhanced energy dissipation. Such a design solution has shown its effectiveness in protecting both structural and non-structural components, hence preserving their functionality even in the aftermath of a major seismic event.
Despite lead rubber bearings being invented in New Zealand almost forty years ago, the Christchurch Women’s hospital was the only isolated building in Christchurch when the Canterbury earthquake sequence struck in 2010/11. Furthermore, a reference code for designing base-isolated buildings in New Zealand is still missing. The absence of a design standard or at least of a consensus on design guidelines is a potential source for a lack of uniformity in terms of performance criteria and compliance design approaches. It may also limit more widespread use of the technology in New Zealand.
The present paper provides an overview of the major international codes (American, Japanese and European) for the design of base-isolated buildings. The design performance requirements, the analysis procedures, the design review process and approval/quality control of devices outlined in each code are discussed and their respective pros and cons are compared through a design application on a benchmark building in New Zealand. The results gathered from this comparison are intended to set the basis for the development of guidelines specific for the New Zealand environment.
Downloads
References
Feng D, Liu W, Masuda K, Wang S and Huan S (2006a). “A Comparative Study of Seismic Isolation Codes Worldwide - Part I: Design Spectrum”, 1st ECEES, Paper N. 63, Geneva.
Feng D, Liu W, Masuda K, Wang S and Huan S (2006b). “A Comparative Study of Seismic Isolation Codes Worldwide - Part II: Response Analysis”, 1st ECEES, Paper N. 66, Geneva.
ASCE 7-10. (2010). “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures”. ASCE, Reston, Virginia.
EN 1998-1 (2004). “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings”, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
NTC08 (2008). “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni”– DM 14-01-2008, Italy.
MRIT (2000). “The Notification and Commentary on the Structural Calculation Procedures for Building with Seismic Isolation” Edited by MLIT, BRI, BCJ, JAGM and JSSI (in Japanese).
Kani N and Otani S (2002). “Japanese State of Practice in Design of Seismically Isolated Buildings”. The Fourth U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, 22–24 October 2002, Toba, Japan, PEER 2002/21.
Kani N, Feng D and Sera S (2010). “Performance Based Design of Seismically Isolated Buildings in Japan”, Workshop: Bridges Seismic Isolation and Large Scale Modelling, June 29th - July 3rd, 2010, St.-Petersburg, Russia.
Higashino M and Okamoto S (2006). “Response Control and Seismic Isolation of Buildings”. Taylor & Francis, New York (US). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203018866
Becker TC, Furukawa S, Mahin SA and Nakashima M (2010). “Comparison of US and Japanese Codes and Practices for Seismically Isolated Buildings”. ASCE Structures Congress, doi: 10.1061/41130(369)211, page 2330-2338, Orlando, FL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)211
NEHRP (2011). “Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses”. NIST GCR 11-917-15 Report, November 2011.
AASHTO (1999). “Guide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials”. Washington D.C., USA.
EN 15129:2009. “Anti-Seismic Devices”. CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
Standards New Zealand (2004). “NZS 1170.5:2004 Structural Design Actions – Part 5: Earthquake Actions– New Zealand”. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
Faccioli E and Villani M (2009). “Seismic Hazard Mapping for Italy in Terms of Broadband Displacement Response Spectra”. Earthquake Spectra 25: 515-539.
