Preliminary observations from biaxial testing of a two-storey, two-by-one bay, reinforced concrete slotted beam superassembly

Authors

  • C.A. Muir University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • D.K. Bull University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • S. Pampanin University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-6697

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.45.3.97-104

Abstract

Displacement incompatibility between reinforced concrete moment frames and precast flooring systems has been shown experimentally, and in historical earthquakes, to be an area of concern. Plastic hinge formation necessitates beam damage and the resulting elongation of the beam reduces the seating length of the floor, exacerbates the floor damage and induces unanticipated force distributions in the system. In severe cases this can lead to collapse.

The slotted beam is a detail that protects the integrity of the floor diaphragm, respects the hierarchy of strengths intended by the designer and sustains less damage. The detail provides the same ductility and moment resistance as traditional details, whilst exhibiting improved structural performance. This is achieved with only a subtle change in the detailing and no increase in build cost.

This paper briefly presents the development of the slotted beam in reinforced concrete. The design and construction of a large scale reinforced concrete slotted beam superassembly is described. The experimental method used to undertake biaxial quasi-static testing is introduced. Preliminary observations from the experiment are presented. It is shown that the reinforced concrete slotted beam is a viable replacement for the traditional monolithic detail. Extremely promising structural performance and significantly reduced damage compared to monolithic reinforced concrete details is presented.

References

ACI Committee 374. (2005). Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary. Farmington Hills, Michigan.

Amaris, A., Pampanin, S., Bull, D.K. & Carr, A.J. (2008). Experimental Investigation on a Hybrid Jointed Precast Frame with Non-tearing Floor Connections. Paper presented at the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Conference.

Au, E. (2010). The mechanics and design of a non-tearing floor connection using slotted reinforced concrete beams. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Bull, D.K. (2004). Understanding the complexities of designing diaphragms in buildings for earthquakes. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 37(2), 70-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.37.2.70-88

Byrne, J.D.R. & Bull., D.K. (2012). Design and testing of reinforced concrete frames incorporating the slotted beam detail. Paper presented at the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.45.2.77-83

CAE. (1999). Guidelines for the use of structural precast concrete in buildings. Christchurch, New Zealand: Centre for Advanced Engineering.

Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. (1995). The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake January 17, 1995 Preliminary reconnaissance report. Oakland, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

Harris, H.G. & Sabnis, G.M. (1999). Structural modelling and experimental techniques (2 ed.): CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York and Washington D.C.

Leslie, B.J. (2010). The development and validation of a non-tearing floor precast concrete structural system for seismic regions. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Lindsay, R. (2004). Experiments on the seismic performance of hollow-core floor system in precast concrete buildings. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

MacPherson, C. (2005). Seismic performance and forensic analysis of a precast concrete hollow-core floor super-assemblage. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Matthews, J.G. (2004). Hollow-core floor slab performance following a severe earthquake. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Norton, J.A., King, A.B., Bull, D.K., Chapman, H.E., McVerry, G.H., Larkin, T.J., et al. (1994). Northridge Reconnaissance Report. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 27(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.27.4.235-344

Ohkubo, M. & Hamamoto, T. (2004). Developing reinforced concrete slotted beam structures to reduce earthquake damage and enhance seismic structural performance. Proceedings of the 13th annual World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver.

Ohkubo, M., Matsuoka, T., Yoshioka, T. & Anderson, D.L. (1999). Shear transfer mechanism of reinforced concrete beams with a slot at the beam-end. Proceedings of Japan Concrete Institute, 21(3), 301-306.

Palmieri, L., Saqan, C., French, C. & Kreger, M. (1996). Ductile connections for precast concrete frame systems. ACI, 162, 313-356.

Peng, B.H.H. (2009). Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings with precast concrete floor systems. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Priestley, M.J.N. (1996). The PRESSS program - Current status and proposed plans for phase III. PCI Journal, 41(2), 22-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011996.22.40

Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. & Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.

Standards New Zealand. (2006). Concrete Strucutures Standard, New Zealand Standard NZS3101. Wellington, New Zealand.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2012

How to Cite

Muir, C., Bull, D., & Pampanin, S. (2012). Preliminary observations from biaxial testing of a two-storey, two-by-one bay, reinforced concrete slotted beam superassembly. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 45(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.45.3.97-104

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories