Rapid assessment of peak storey drift demands on reinforced concrete frame buildings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.3.109-118

Abstract

The peak storey drift demands that an earthquake imposes on a building can be assessed through a detailed engineering seismic assessment or recorded if a building is instrumented. However, for the rapid seismic assessment of a large number of buildings, it is desirable to have a simplified means of estimating storey drift demands. Consequently, this paper proposes a simplified means of quickly estimating storey drift demands on reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings. Expressions for peak storey drift demand as a function of ground motion intensity are developed by utilising concepts and simplifications available from displacement-based seismic design and assessment methods. The performance of the approach is gauged by comparing predicted storey drift demands with those obtained from rigorous non-linear time-history analyses for a number of case study buildings. The promising results suggest that the approach proposed will be useful for rapidly assessing the likelihood of damage to a range of drift-sensitive elements in modern RC frame buildings.

References

Cubrinovski M, Bradley B, Elwood KJ, Johnston D, Wotherspoon L, Sullivan TJ and Orchiston C (Under Review). “Wellington’s Earthquake Resilience: Lessons from the 2016 Kaikōura Earthquake” Earthquake Spectra.

Kestrel (2017). “Wellington City Council Targeted Assessment Programme following the Kaikoura Earthquake of 14 November 2016”. Technical Report, Kestrel Group Ltd, Wellington, NZ.

Matthews J (2004). "Hollow-Core Floor Slab Performance following a Severe Earthquake”. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.

Fenwick R, Bull D and Gardiner D (2010). “Assessment of Hollow-Core Floors for Seismic Performance”. Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ.

Priestley MJN, Calvi GM and Kowalsky MJ (2007). “Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures”. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

Pettinga JD and Priestley MJN (2005). “Dynamic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed with Direct Displacement-Based Design”. Research Report ROSE - 2005/02, IUSS press, Pavia, Italy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002419

Shibata A and Sozen MA (1976). “Substitute Structure Method for Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete”. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 102: ST1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004250

Gulkan P and Sozen M (1974). “Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions”. ACI Journal, 71(12): 604-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/7110

Sullivan TJ (2011). “An Energy Factor Method for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of RC Wall Structures”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(15): 1083-1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.554600

Sullivan TJ (2013). “Highlighting differences between force-based and displacement-based design solutions for RC frame structures”. Structural Engineering International, 2/2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149156958

Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM and Priestley MJN (Editors) (2012). “A Model Code for the Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures DBD12”. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, ISBN 9788861980723 8861980724.

Beyer K, Dazio A and Priestley MJN (2008). “Seismic Design of Torsionally Eccentric Buildings with RC U-Shaped Walls”. Research Report ROSE-2008/03, IUSS Press: www.iusspress.it.

Fox MJ, Beyer K and Sullivan TJ (2017). “Application of a recently proposed displacement-based assessment procedure for asymmetric-plan RC wall buildings”. Proceedings 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 9-13 January, Santiago, Chile, Paper 2048.

Sullivan TJ, Pennucci D, Piazza A, Manieri S, Welch DP and Calvi GM (2013). “General aspects of the displacement based assessment approach”. in Developments in the Field of Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment, Edited by Sullivan TJ and Calvi GM, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, ISBN: 978-88-6198-090-7.

Priestley MJN (1998). “Brief Comments on Elastic Flexibility of Reinforced Concrete Frames and Significance to Seismic Design”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(4): 246-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.31.4.246-259

Aninthaneni PK and Dhakal RP (2016). “Prediction of fundamental period of regular frame buildings”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 49(2): 175-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.49.2.175-189

Aninthaneni PK and Dhakal RP (2017). “Prediction of lateral stiffness and fundamental period of concentrically braced frame buildings”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15: 3053–3082, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-0081-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0081-7

Crowley H and Pinho R (2010). “Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39: 223-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.949

CEN EC8 (2004). “Eurocode 8 – Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistant Structures, EN-1998-1:2004: E”. Comite Europeen de Normalization, Brussels, Belgium.

Raghunandan M, Liel AB and Luco N (2015). “Collapse Risk of Buildings in the Pacific Northwest Region due to Subduction Earthquakes”. Earthquake Spectra, 31(4): 2087-2115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/012114EQS011M

International Code Council (2012). “International Building Code”. Pasadena, CA, USA.

Haselton CB and Deierlein GG (2007). “Assessing seismic collapse capacity of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings”. Report No. 156, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40944(249)22

Bhanu V, Chandramohan R and Sullivan TJ (in Production). “Quantifying the impact of ground motion duration on the capacity of reinforced concrete frame structures”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.

Vamvatsikos D and Cornell CA (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31: 491-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141

Chandramohan R, Baker JW and Deierlein GG (2016). “Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records”. Earthquake Spectra, 32(2): 927–950. DOI: 10.1193/122813EQS298MR2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/122813EQS298MR2

FEMA (2009). “Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors”. Technical Report FEMA P695. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2019

How to Cite

Sullivan, T. J. (2019). Rapid assessment of peak storey drift demands on reinforced concrete frame buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 52(3), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.3.109-118

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories