A comparison of the seismic design requirements in the New Zealand Loadings Standard with other major design codes

Authors

  • Richard Fenwick University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • David Lau University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Barry Davidson University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.35.3.190-203

Abstract

A series of ductile moment resisting reinforced concrete frames are sized to meet the minimum seismic provisions of the New Zealand Loadings Standard, NZS 4203-1992, the Draft NZ/Australian Loadings Standard, the Uniform Building Code, UBC-1997, the International Building code, IBC 2000 (1998 draft) and Eurocode 8 (1998 draft). The results of the analyses allow valid comparisons to be made between the different codes. It is shown that comparisons of individual clauses can be misleading due to the many interactions that occur between clauses.

Comparative analyses were made for the buildings described above located in both high and low seismic regions. It is shown that the strength and stiffness requirements for both the New Zealand Loadings Standard and the Draft Standard are low compared with the other codes of practice in the high seismic zone. It is recommended that the required design strengths in the Draft NZ/Australian Standard be increased.

References

NZS, 1992, "General Structural Design and Design Loadings for Buildings, NZS 4203-1992", Standards New Zealand.

NZS AS, "Draft Revision of AS 1170.4 and NZS 4203:1992", Feb. 2001 but including Part 4, revision of 20-02-2002.

ICBO, 1997, "Uniform Building Code 97", Vol. 2. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA.

BOCA and ICBO, 1998, "International Building Code, sections 16 and 19", final draft, July 1998.

Eurocode 8, 1998, " Design Provisions for earthquake resistant structures" Parts 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3. Draft for Development. BSI.

Booth, E. D., Kappos, A. J. and Park, R., "A critical review of international practice on seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings", The Structural Engineer, Vol. 76, No. 11, June 1998, pp213-220.

Fenwick, R. C., Davidson, B. J. and Booth, E., "A comparison of seismic design actions in Eurocode 8, Uniform Building Code and the New Zealand Loadings Standard", Australasian Structural Conference, Auckland Oct. 1998, Vol. 1, pp411-417.

NZS 3101-1995, "Concrete Structures Standard, Design of Concrete Structures", Standards Association New Zealand, Pat 1, 256p, Part 2, 264p.

SAP2000, Computers and Structures Inc. Berkeley, California.1998.

European Committee for Standardisation, "design of concrete structures, Part 1, General rules and rules for buildings", Eurocode 2, 1992, pp253.

Fenwick, R. C., Davidson, B. J. and Chung, B. T., "P-delta actions in seismic resistant Structures" Bulletin New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.25, No. 1, March.1992, pp56-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.25.1.56-69

Bernal, D., "Amplification factors for inelastic dynamic P-delta effects in earthquake analysis", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 15, 1987, pp635-651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150508

Ellis, B. R., " An assessment of the accuracy of predicting the fundamental natural frequency of buildings and the implications concerning dynamic analysis of structures", Proceedings of the ICE (London), Sept. 1980, Vol. 69, Pt. 2, pp 763-776.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2002

How to Cite

Fenwick, R., Lau, D., & Davidson, B. (2002). A comparison of the seismic design requirements in the New Zealand Loadings Standard with other major design codes . Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 35(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.35.3.190-203

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories