Seismic design for torsional response of ductile buildings

Authors

  • T. Paulay University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.29.3.178-198

Abstract

A simple approach to the consideration of torsional effects in the seismic design of ductile building structures is postulated. Instead of increasing torsional strength, the control of twist, which may amplify local inelastic translational deformations, is emphasised. This may be achieved by assuring that some residual torsional stiffness of the system is available. A number of examples illustrate the simple principles involved. It is demonstrated that traditional codified techniques, based on the evaluation of torsional effects in elastic systems, are largely irrelevant to ductile structural response. It is recommended that, in accord with the philosophy of capacity design, torsional response should be controlled by elastic elements, while hysteretic damping is derived from inelastic translational mechanisms. As a general rule critical conditions for torsional response of well proportioned structures are likely to arise only when inelastic displacements are imposed in a narrow band of directions diagonal to the principal reference axes of orthogonal systems. It is suggested that in the presence of significant eccentricities the displacement ductility demand on the system should be reduced. Thereby elements with defined ductility capacity can be protected against excessive imposed inelastic deformations. The presentation addresses primarily concepts of torsional behaviour rather than advancement in analytical techniques.

References

Standard Association of New Zealand, 1992. Code of Practice for General Structural Design Loadings for Buildings, NZS 4203:1992, Wellington.

Paulay, T and MJN Priestley, 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry structures, John Wiley and Sons, pp 767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172841

Standards New Zealand, NZS 3101:1995. Concrete Structures Standard Part 1 -The design of concrete structures, pp 256, Part 2-Commentary on the design of concrete structures, pp 264.

Tso, WK and CM Wong, 1993. An evaluation of the New Zealand code torsional provision, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 26(2):194-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.26.2.194-207

Architectural Institute of Japan, 1994. All Structural Design Guidelines for Reinforced Concrete Buildings", Tokyo, pp 207.

European Committee for Standardisation, 1993. Eurocode 8 - Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, Lisbon.

De La Llera, Juan and Anil Chopra, 1995. Understanding o f inelastic seismic behaviour of asymmetric - plan buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24:549-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240407

Downloads

Published

30-09-1996

How to Cite

Paulay, . T. (1996). Seismic design for torsional response of ductile buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 29(3), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.29.3.178-198

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories