On California structural steel seismic design

Authors

  • Egor P. Popov University of California, Berkeley, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.20.1.7-21

Abstract

A number of new code developments, largely initiated in California, are taking place in the USA for the seismic design of steel structures. 
The principal ones are reviewed and commented upon in the paper. Key experimental support for some of the changes is indicated. Major attention is directed to the three main types of steel construction: moment resisting frames, concentrically braced steel frames, and, the relatively new method for seismic design, eccentric bracing. Some of the proposed and possible practical improvements in moment-resisting connections are given: the reasons for some concern over the use of concentrically braced frames for severe seismic applications are discussed; and a brief overview on the application of eccentrically braced steel frames is presented. The paper concludes with a few remarks on future trends and needs in structural
steel seismic design.

References

AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 1934. Steel construction manual. New York, N.Y. 2d ed., p.127.

AISC. 1980. Manual of steel construction. Chicago, IL.

AISC. 1985. Proposed (LRFD) load and resistance factor design specifications for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL.

ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1978. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. NBS Special Publication 510. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

Astaneh-Asl, A., Goel, S.C, and Hanson, R.D. 1982. Cyclic behaviour of double angle bracing members with gusset plates. Report No. UMEE 82R7, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Ballio, G. and Plumier, A. 1985. Definition d'une methode experimental de la resistance antisismique d'elements de structure en acier. Construction Metallique. (3)21-35.

Bertero, V .V. et al. 19 86. Analytical and experimental studies conducted on the response of 0.3 scale models of 6-story steel structures to earthquake ground motions. Proceedings 3rd U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Charleston, S.C.

B.R.I. (Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan) Steel Group. 1985. Full scale tests on a six-story steel building. U.S.-Japan Sixth Joint Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting. Maui, Hawaii.

Bridge, R.Q. 1976. Concrete filled steel tubular columns. Research Report No. R283. University of Sydney, Australia.

BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council). 19 85. NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings. Washington. D.C.

Driscoll, G.C. and Beedle, L.S. 1982. Suggestions for avoiding beam-to-column connection failure. AISC Engineering Journal. 19 (1) 16-19.

Feodos'ev, V.I. 1950. Selected problems and questions in strength of materials (in Russian). Technico-Theoretical Literature. Moscow, U.S.S.R. 188-192.

Fitzgerald, R.F. 1985. Slotted bolted connections in seismic resistant bracing systems. T.F. Fitzgerald & Associates, San Francisco, CA.

Gugerli, H. and Goel, S.C. 1982. Inelastic cyclic behaviour of steel bracing members. Report No. UMEE Rl. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Itoh, H. and Wang, M.L. 1985. Nonstructural element test phase. U.S.-Japan Sixth Joint Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting. Maui, Hawaii.

Koller, K. 1981. SaintJohn beam-column. U.S.A. Patent No. 4,281,487.

Krawinkler, H. 1978. Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames. AISC Engineering Journal. 15(3)82-91.

Krawinkler, H., Bertero, V.V. and Popov, E.P. 1971. Inelastic behaviour of steel beam-to-column subassemblages. Report No. EERC 71-7. University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Lee, S.J. and Lu, L.W. 1985. Cyclic tests of full-scale composite beam-to-column joints. U.S.-Japan Sixth Joint Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting. Maui, Hawaii.

Maison, B.F. and Popov, E.P. 1980. Cyclic response prediction for braced steel frames. Jour. Struct. Div. ASCE. 106(ST7) 1401-1416.

Merovich, A.T. and Nicoletti, J.F. 1982. Eccentric bracing in tall buildings. Jour. Struct. Div., ASCE. 108(6) 2066-2080.

Manheim, D.N. and Popov, E.P. 19 83. Plastic shear hinges in steel frames. Jour. Struct. Engrg., ASCE. 109(10) 2404-2419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:10(2404)

Pall, A.S. and Marsh, C= 1982. Response of friction damped braced frames. Jour. Struct. Engrg., ASCE. 108(6) 1313-1323.

Paulay, T. 1983. Deterministic seismic design procedures for reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures. 5(1) 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(83)90044-5

Popov, E.P. 1979. Inelastic behaviour of steel braces under cyclic loading. Proceedings 2d U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Stanford, CA. 923-932.

Popov, E.P., Amin, N.R., Louis, J.J.C., and Stephen, R.M. 1985. Cyclic behaviour of large beam-to-column assemblies. Earthquake Spectra. 1(2) 203-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585263

Popov, E.P. and Black, R.G. 1981. Steel struts under severe cyclic loadings. Jour. Struct. Div., ASCE. 107(ST9) 1857-1881.

Popov, E.P. and Pinkey, R.B. 1968. Behaviour of steel building connections subjected to inelastic strain reversals. Bulletins 13 & 14. American Iron and Steel Institute. New York, N.Y.

Popov, E.P. and Stephen, R.M. 1972. Cyclic loading of full-size steel connections. Bulletin 21. American Iron and Steel Institute, New York, N.Y.

Popov, E.P. and Stephen, R.M. 1977. Tensile capacity of partial penetration welds. Jour. Struct. Div. ASCE. 103 (ST9) 1721-1729.

Rentschler, G.P., Chen, W.F., and Driscoll, G.S. 1980. Tests on beam-to-column web moment connections. Jour. Struct. Div. ASCE. 106 (ST5) 1005-1022.

SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 1976. Recommended lateral force requirements. Seismology Committee. San Francisco, CA.

SEAOC. 1985. Tentative lateral force requirements. Seismology Committee. Los Angeles/Sacramento/San Francisco, CA.

Scholl, R.E. 1984. Brace dampers: an alternative structural system for improving the earthquake performance of buildings. Proceedings 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco, CA.

Standards Association of New Zealand. 1982. Code of practice for the design of concrete structures. NZS 3104. Wellington, N.Z.

Tsai, K.-C. and Popov, E.P., 19 86. Alternative designs and tests of beam-to-column web seismic moment connections. Report No. UCB/EERC-86/05. University of California, Berkeley, CA.

UBC (Uniform Building Code). 1985. International conference of building officials. Whittier. CA.

Wyllie, L.A. Jr. 1985. The 1985 international engineering symposium on structural steel committee, AISC. Chicago, IL. 7-1 to 7-14.

Yamanouchi, H. et al. 19 84. Experimental results on a K-braced steel structure under seismic loading utilizing full-scale sixstorey test structures - U.S.-Japan Cooperative Research Program. Proceedings, 1984 Annual Meeting. Structural Stability Research Council. San Francisco, CA.

Downloads

Published

31-03-1987

How to Cite

Popov, E. P. (1987). On California structural steel seismic design. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 20(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.20.1.7-21

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories