Seismic hazard with deterministic maximum limits: Considerations in a New Zealand-specific context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1706Abstract
This paper outlines the consideration of deterministic limits on maximum ground motion levels within seismic design codes and standards. The specific motivation is to outline the basis for the exclusion of such a limit in the 2024 draft Technical Specification for NZS1170.5 [1], despite the presence of such limits in NZS1170.5:2004 [2]. An overview of the historical consideration of so-called ‘deterministic’ and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis methods is provided, as well as how they have translated into contemporary seismic design codes and standards in New Zealand (NZ) and internationally. The fundamental issues with deterministic maximum limits are outlined through the use of examples in a NZ-specific context. The underlying reason ‘well above average’ ground-motion intensity levels (for a given earthquake scenario) are prevalent in regions of high seismicity is discussed, as well as other common misconceptions that lead to the use of deterministic limits to achieve apparently realistic design ground motion intensities. Finally, in the vein of the hazard-risk separation principle, sentiments are expressed for achieving economic and resilient seismic design in regions of high seismicity without resorting to implementing deterministic limits.
References
Standards New Zealand (2024). “Draft Technical Specification for ’Structural design actions - Part 5: Earthquake actions - New Zealand’ (TS1170.5)”: Wellington, New Zealand, 126pp.
Standards New Zealand (2004). “NZS 1170.5:2004 Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand”: Wellington, New Zealand, 82pp.
Baker JW, Bradley BA and Stafford PJ (2021). Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 978-1-108-42505-6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/seismic-hazard-and-risk- analysis/177B4BA01FC2600AA53A22B27598A06C
American Society of Civil Engineers (2022). “ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures”: Reston, VA, 1046pp.
NZSOLD (2015). “New Zealand Dam Safety Guidelines”. ISBN: 978-0-908960-65-1.
Stewart JP, Luco N, Hooper JD and Crouse CB (2020). “Risk-targeted alternatives to deterministic ground motion caps in U.S. seismic provisions”. Earthquake Spectra, 36(2): 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019892010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019892010
Fajfar P (2018). “Analysis in seismic provisions for buildings: past, present and future”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(7): 2567–2608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-0170290-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0290-8
Cornell C (1968). “Engineering seismic risk analysis”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5): 1583–1606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583
Esteva L (1970). “Seismic risk and seismic design decisions”. pp 142-82 of Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants. Hansen, Robert J. (ed.). Cambridge, Mass. Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Press (1970). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4173240
McGuire RK (1976). “FORTRAN Computer Program for Seismic Risk Analysis”. USGS Open-File Report 76-67. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr7667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr7667
McGuire R (2008). “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: early history”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37: 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.765
Esteva L (1970). “Regionalizacion Sismica de Mexico para Fines de Ingenieria.” Technical Report 246, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
Matuschka T, Berryman KR, O’Leary AJ, McVerry GH, Mulholland WM and Skinner RI (1985). “New Zealand seismic hazard analysis”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 18(4): 313–322. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.18.4.313-322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.18.4.313-322
Stein S, Geller R and Liu M (2011). “Bad assumptions or bad luck: Why earthquake hazard maps need objective testing”. Seismological Research Letters, 82(5):623–626. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.5.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.5.623
Krinitzsky EL (2002). “How to obtain earthquake ground motions for engineering design”. Engineering Geology, 65(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7952(01)00098-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00098-9
Klügel JU (2007). “Comment on “Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?” by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A. Abrahamson”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(6): 2198–2207. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070018
Hanks TC, Beroza GC and Toda S (2012). “Have recent earthquakes exposed flaws in or misunderstandings of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis?” Seismological Research Letters, 83(5): 759-764. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120043
Frankel A (2013). “Comment on “Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it” by Stein S, Geller R, and Liu M”. Tectonophysics, 592: 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.032
Bommer JJ and Abrahamson NA (2007). “Reply to "Comment on ’Why do modern probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses often lead to increased hazard estimates?’ by Klugel JU. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(6): 2208–2211. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070100
Bommer JJ (2002). “Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: An exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(1 supp 1): 43–73. https://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/13632460209350432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460209350432
McGuire RK (2001). “Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(5): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00019-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00019-7
Anderson JG (1997). “Benefits of scenario ground motion maps”. Engineering Geology, 48(1): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)81913-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)81913-8
Gerstenberger MC, Marzocchi W, Allen T, Pagani M, Adams J, Danciu L, Field EH, Fujiwara H, Luco N, Ma KF, Meletti C and Petersen MD (2020). “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at regional and national scales: State of the art and future challenges”. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(2): e2019RG000653. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000653
GEM (2024). “Global Earthquake Model Foundation”. http://www.globalquakemodel.org/
SSHAC (1997). “Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts”. Technical report, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Electric Power Research Institute.
Council BSS (1997). “NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1: Provisions and Part 2: Commentary”. Technical Report FEMA 303, Washington, DC.
American Society of Civil Engineers (2016). “ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures”: Reston, VA, 822pp.
Standards New Zealand (2004). “NZS1170.5:2004 Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand - Commentary”: Wellington, New Zealand, 86pp.
Gerstenberger MC, Bora S, Bradley BA, DiCaprio C, Kaiser A, Manea EF, Nicol A, Rollins C, Stirling MW, Thingbaijam KKS, Van Dissen RJ, Abbott ER, Atkinson GM, Chamberlain C, Christophersen A, Clark K, Coffey GL, de la Torre CA, Ellis SM, Fraser J, Graham K, Griffin J, Hamling IJ, Hill MP, Howell A, Hulsey A, Hutchinson J, Iturrieta P, Johnson KM, Jurgens VO, Kirkman R, Langridge RM, Lee RL, Litchfield NJ, Maurer J, Milner KR, Rastin S, Rattenbury MS, Rhoades DA, Ristau J, Schorlemmer D, Seebeck H, Shaw BE, Stafford PJ, Stolte AC, Townend J, Villamor P, Wallace LM, Weatherill G, Williams CA and Wotherspoon LM (2024). “The 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand national seismic hazard model: Process, overview, and results”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 114(1): 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230182
Reiter L (1990). Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New York.
Bradley BA and Cubrinovski M (2011). “Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4): 181–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.181-194
Bradley BA (2012). “Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield, New Zealand earthquake”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 42: 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.004
Bradley BA (2016). “Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the 13 June 2011 Mw6.0 Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake”. 6ICEGE – Earthquake Geotechincal Engineeering, 91: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.006
Bradley BA, Bae SE, Polak V, Lee RL, Thomson EM and Tarbali K (2017). “Ground motion simulations of great earthquakes on the Alpine Fault: effect of hypocentre location and comparison with empirical modelling”. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 60(3): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2017.1297313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2017.1297313
Thomson EM, Lee RL and Bradley BA (2019). “Ground motion simulations of Hope fault earthquakes”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 52(4): 152–171. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.4.152-171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.4.152-171
Bradley BA (2012). “Ground Motion and Seismicity Aspects of the 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes”. Technical Report Prepared for the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/20120116.2087
Schwartz D and Coppersmith K (1984). “Fault behaviour and characteristic earthquakes – Examples from the Wasatch and San-Andreas fault zones”. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(7): 5681–5698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p05681
Youngs R and Coppersmith K (1985). “Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4): 939–964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(86)90651-0
Field E, Dawson T, Felzer K, Frankel A, Gupta V, Jordan T, Parsons T, Petersen M, Stein R, Weldon II R and Wills C (2008). “The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2)”. USGS Open File Report 2007-1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080049
Stirling M, McVerry G and Berryman K (2002). “A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(5): 1878–1903. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010156
Field EH and Page MT (2011). “Estimating earthquake-rupture rates on a fault or fault system”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100004
Field EH, Milner KR and Page MT (2020). “Generalizing the inversion-based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(1): 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200219
Jayaram N and Baker J (2008). “Statistical tests of the joint distribution of spectral acceleration values”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(5): 2231–2243. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070208
Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA, Strasser FO, Pecker A, Bard PY, Bungum H, Cotton F, Fäh D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F and Studer J (2004). “The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions”. Seismological Research Letters, 75(1): 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.75.1.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.75.1.82
Bradley BA (2013). “A New Zealand-specific pseudospectral acceleration ground-motion prediction equation for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(3): 1801–1822. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120021
Bradley BA, Bora SS, Lee RL, Manea EF, Gerstenberger MC, Stafford PJ, Atkinson GM, Weatherill G, Hutchinson J, de la Torre CA, Hulsey AM and Kaiser AE (2024). “The ground-motion characterization model for the 2022 New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model”. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 114(1): 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230170
AS/NZS11700 (2002). “Structural Design Actions, Part 0: General Principles”. Technical report, Standards Australia.
Marzocchi W and Meletti C (2024). “PSHA: Does it deal with what it is or what we want it to be?” Seismological Research Letters, 95(3): 1469–1472. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230418
Jordan TH, Marzocchi W, Michael AJ and Gerstenberger MC (2014). “Operational earthquake forecasting can enhance earthquake preparedness”. Seismological Research Letters, 85(5): 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140143
Porter KA (2016). “Safe enough? A building code to protect our cities and our lives”. Earthquake Spectra, 32(2): 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1193/112213eqs286m DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/112213eqs286m
Hare J (2019). “A different way of thinking about seismic risk: A call for debate”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 52(3): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.3.141-149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.3.141-149
