Seismic enhancement of community housings in Nepal’s mid-Himalayas: Retrofitting and reconstruction scenarios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1733Abstract
Nepal lies within the Himalayan seismic belt, making it one of the most earthquake-prone regions globally. Non-engineered masonry structures, though widely used, are highly vulnerable to seismic disasters. Replacing these structures is impractical and culturally insensitive due to their deep traditional and cultural significance. Retrofitting is a practical and culturally appropriate approach to enhance a building’s strength and safety against earthquakes. This study evaluates retrofitting and reinforcement techniques for unreinforced masonry (URM) structures in Nepal's mid-Himalayan region through numerical modelling, non-linear static analysis, and fragility assessment. Pushover analysis revealed that reconstruction models significantly improve base shear capacity compared to the URM model. Although gabion wire retrofitting has a limited effect at the initial stage, it significantly improves strength at larger displacements. Vertical reinforcements and horizontal bands in the reconstruction model consistently enhance performance. The URM model exhibits concentrated cracking near openings and corners, while the retrofitted model improves stress distribution and reduces crack widths. Additionally, the reconstruction model confines cracks within bands, preventing vertical propagation and ensuring superior structural integrity. Fragility curves reveal that reinforcement significantly enhances seismic performance, as the retrofitted model improves resistance across damage states, with exceptional collapse resistance due to its ductility, allowing energy absorption and delayed failure. The reconstruction model offers consistent protection with lower probabilities of damage across all states, underscoring its reliability during seismic events. Although the reconstruction model incurs higher costs than the retrofitted model due to its extensive reinforcement features, both models provide substantial seismic benefits compared to the base URM model.
References
Seeber L and Armbruster JG (1981). “Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long‐term forecasting”. Earthquake Prediction: An International Review, 4: 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1029/me0:4p0259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/ME004p0259
Dhakal S, Bai L, Neupane B, Li L and Song B (2019). “Review of earthquake activity and faulting structure in Nepal Himalaya”. Bulletin of Nepal Geological Society, 36.
NPC (2015). “Nepal Earthquake 2015 - Post Disaster Needs Assessment Vol. B: Sector Reports”. National Planning Commission, Government of Nepal.
Khadka B and Shakya M (2015). “Seismic characteristics of unreinforced mud masonry houses in Nepal: A miserable scenario before and after 2015 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake”. Engineering Failure Analysis, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105308
Ismail N, McGrannachan K and Hazelton G (2013). ‘Characterisation and seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings in Dunedin CBD’. Bulletin of The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 46(3): 131-140. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.3.131-140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.3.131-140
Bothara JK and Hiçyılmaz KMO (2008). “General observations of building behaviour during the 8th October 2005 Pakistan earthquake”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 41(4): 209–233. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.4.209-233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.4.209-233
Kafle P, Upadhyay M and Shreedhar K (2024). “Vulnerability assessment of touristic village in Nepal Himalayas: A case study of Lwang village”. Journal of Engineering Issues and Solutions, 3: 162-176. https://doi.org/10.3126/joeis.v3i1.67094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/joeis.v3i1.67094
Bothara J, Ingham J and Dizhur D (2022). “Qualifying the earthquake resilience of vernacular masonry buildings along the Himalayan arc”. Journal of Building Engineering, 52: 104339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104339
Okazaki K, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D and Saito T (2012). “Comparison of current construction practices of non-engineered buildings in developing countries”. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sep 24-28, Lisbon, Portugal.
Macabuag J, Guragain R and Bhattacharya S (2012). “Seismic retrofitting of non-engineered masonry in rural Nepal”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 165(6): 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.10.00015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.10.00015
NRA (2015). “Strategic Paper on Private Housing Retrofitting after Post 2015 Gorkha Earthquake”. National Reconstruction Authority, Government of Nepal.
DUDBC (2016). “Seismic Retrofitting Guidelines of Buildings in Nepal – Masonry”. Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Government of Nepal.
Shrestha H, Pradhan S and Guragain R (2012). “Experiences on retrofitting of low strength masonry buildings by different retrofitting techniques in Nepal”. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sep 24-28, Lisbon, Portugal.
Wang M, Liu K, Lu H, Shrestha H, Guragain R, Pan W and Yang X (2019). “Increasing the lateral capacity of dry joint flat-stone masonry structures using inexpensive retrofitting techniques”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17: 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0454-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0454-1
Bothara JK, Ahmad N, Ingham JM and Dizhur D (2023). “Mechanical properties of stone masonry set in mud mortar and contained by steel wire mesh”. Construction and Building Materials, 405. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.4.209-233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4371062
Shrestha L, Shakya S and Norris A (2021). “Comparing seismic retrofitting approaches of traditional stone masonry in mud mortar buildings in Nepal”. VIKAS: Special Issue on Nepal’s Post Earthquake Recovery & Reconstruction, Vol. I.
Dhungel R, Baskota A, Gouli M, Guragain R, Tiwari A, Motra P, Pathak H, Dahal P and Shrestha P (2020). “Efforts and impacts of socio-technical assistance for retrofitting in post-earthquake reconstruction in Nepal”. 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sendai, Japan.
Giordano N, Norris A, Manandhar V, Shrestha L, Paudel DR, Quinn N, Rees E, Shrestha H, Marasini, NP and Prajapati R (2021). “Financial assessment of incremental seismic retrofitting of Nepali stone-masonry buildings”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102297
Dhakal R (2024). “Seismic design of buildings: Where to next?” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 57(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1680
Nepal Building Code (2015). “NBC 202 Guidelines on: Load Bearing Masonry”. Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Government of Nepal.
Upadhyay M, Budhathoki P, Dhakal N, Tiwari L, Pun S, Barma R and Khakurel S (2024). “Seismic vulnerability assessment of historic masonry structure: A case study of Bindhyabasini temple”. 15th IOE Graduate Conference, May 17-18, Pashchimanchal Campus, Pokhara, Nepal.
DIANA (2025). ‘DIANA FEA 10.5 User’s Manual.
Bothara J, Ingham J and Dizhur D (2024). “Innovative earthquake resistant school building typologies for earthquake-hit areas of Nepal”. Structures, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107641
Lin YL, Fang PF, Wang X, Wu J and Yang GL (2023). “Experimental and numerical study on tensile behavior of double-twisted hexagonal gabion wire mesh”. Buildings, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071657
Adhikari RK and D’Ayala D (2020). “2015 Nepal earthquake: seismic performance and post-earthquake reconstruction of stone in mud mortar masonry buildings”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(8): 3863-3896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00834-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00834-y
Indian Standard (2000). “IS 456 Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice”. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Indian Standard (2005). “IS 883 Design of Structural Timber in Building - Code of Practice”. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Endo Y and Hanazato T (2021). “Seismic assessment of two multi-tiered pagodas damaged by the 2015 Nepal earthquake”. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(2): 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2031-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2031-x
Ban S, Shrestha KC and Bastola S (2021). “Seismic performance assessment of stone masonry buildings: Efficacy of various strengthening elements”. Journal of Building Engineering, 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110380
Applied Technology Council (1996). “ATC 40 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”. Seismic Safety Commission, California, USA.
Otani S, Hiraishi H, Midorikawa M and Teshigawara M (2002). “New seismic design provisions in Japan”. Uzumeri Symposium - Behavior and Design of Concrete Structures for Seismic Performance. https://doi.org/10.14359/11928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/11928
Nepal Building Code (2020). “NBC 105 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal”. Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Government of Nepal.
Pema, Pema and Aoki T (2020). “Seismic evaluation and retrofitting of traditional Bhutanese stone masonry residential house”. Synopsis of IISEE-GRIPS Master Report.
Wen YK, Ellingwood BR and Bracci J (2004). “Vulnerability Function Framework for Consequence-Based Engineering”. Mid-America Earthquake Centre Project, 1–101.
Hough SE, Martin SS, Gahalaut V, Joshi A, Landes M and Bossu R (2016). “A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake”. Natural Hazards, 84: 1661-1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8
