Performance of houses during the Christchurch earthquake of 22 February 2011

Authors

  • Andrew Buchanan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • David Carradine University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-956X
  • Graeme Beattie BRANZ Ltd, Porirua, NZ
  • Hugh Morris University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.342-357

Abstract

The earthquake on 22 February 2011 was very close to Christchurch city, generating very high level ground excitations that caused severe geotechnical effects and widespread structural damage. This paper outlines the wide range of damage to houses resulting from liquefaction, lateral spreading, rockfall, and horizontal and vertical ground accelerations. The response of typical forms of house construction and structural components are discussed, with many different types of damage described. The majority of houses in the Christchurch region are one or two storey light timber frame buildings. This type of construction has performed extremely well for life safety, but thousands of houses have some degree of structural or non-structural damage. The New Zealand Building Code needs to be reviewed in several areas, especially the requirements for foundations and reinforced concrete floors.

References

EQC website. http://canterbury.eqc.govt.nz/

DBH (2011). Revised Guidance on Repairing and Rebuilding Houses Affected by the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. Department of Building and Housing, Wellington.

Berrill, J.B. (2011). Some Aspects of the M6.3 February 22nd 2011 Earthquake. http://www.csi.net.nz/documents/Some%20Aspects%20of%20the%20Feb22%20M6-3_R3.pdf

Allen, J. et al. (2010). Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake, Bulletin of NZSEE, Vol. 43, No. 4, 243-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.4.243-320

Cubrinovski, M., Bradley, B., Wotherspoon, L., Green, R., Bray, J., Wood, C., Pender, M., Allen, J.,. Bradshaw, A, Rix, G., Taylor, M., Robinson, K., Henderson, D., Giorgini, S., Ma, K., Winkley, A. and Zupan, J. (2011). Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake, Bulletin of NZSEE, Vol. 44, No. 4, (this issue). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.205-226

Beattie, G J. (2003). Repair and reinstatement of Earthquake Damaged Houses – Derivation of Repair Techniques - phase II. BRANZ Study Report SR 123, BRANZ, Wellington.

Hunt, Richard and Gerlich, Hans (2011). Post Earthquake Performance of Plasterboard Bracing Systems. Gib Technical Report 10 August 2011. www.gib.co.nz/canterburyearthquake/

Standards New Zealand, (2011). NZS 3604, Timber Framed Buildings, Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.

Letter from FRI to the Fibrous Plasterers Association dated 23 February 1993. http://www.fibrousplaster.org/sites/default/files/Bracing%208mm%20and%2012.5.pdf

Parker, Jeff. (2011). The Performance of Several Lockwood Buildings after the Second Christchurch Earthquake February 2011. Report available from Lockwood Group Ltd.

Love, Keith. (2011). Comments on Performance of Fraemohs Homes in the Canterbury Earthquakes. May 2011. Report available from Fraemohs Homes Ltd.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2011

How to Cite

Buchanan, A., Carradine, D., Beattie, G., & Morris, H. (2011). Performance of houses during the Christchurch earthquake of 22 February 2011. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.342-357