BRB system stability considering frame out-of-plane loading and deformation zone
A simple and economical design approach is described for a BRB system, consisting of a BRB within a steel frame, subject to in-plane and out-of-plane seismic displacements. The approach avoids out-of-plane system or brace instability while allowing large frame out-of-plane deformations and desirable BRB axial performance. It also limits the compressive/tension force ratio. It is based on the simple concept that a brace will be stable with two moment-releases (hinges) but that an out-of-plane buckling mechanism may occur with more than two. The hinges are detailed as specified deformation zones (SDZs) at the brace ends. The hinges use a plate which can yield about its weak axis during out-of-plane movement. Simple methods to assess the stability of the brace itself (between hinges) are developed, an example is provided illustrating how the monotonic deformation demand of the simple plate hinge can be assessed, and detailing recommendations are made to restrict the deformation of the boundary elements at the brace ends.
MacRae G (2014). “BRB Issues, Email to Engineer”. https://www.dropbox.com/s/aw5e0znnkhy5mr3/BRB%20Issues_anonymised.pdf?dl=0
MacRae GA and Clifton GC (2015). “NZ research on steel structures in seismic areas”. 8th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), July 1-3, Shanghai, China, pp. 44-58.
MacRae G (2016). Considerations for BRB Design, ENCI650 Class Notes. University of Canterbury. https://www.dropbox.com/s/y50hwkax0nnf41j/L11_09_BRB%20Design%20Considerations%20_%20MacRae%20June%202016%2B2019.pdf?dl=0
Hariri B and Tremblay R (2019). “Stability of BRB frames under long duration subduction earthquakes”. 12th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, June 17-20, Quebec, Canada, Poster Code: CEISCE-26.
Palmer KD, Roeder CW and Lehman DE (2016). “Connection design recommendations for improved BRBF performance”. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, 53: 29-45.
Sitler B, MacRae G, Takeuchi T, Matsui R, Westeneng B and Jones A (2017). “BRB performance issues”. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), January 9-13, Santiago, Chile, Paper No 1380.
Westeneng B, Lee C-L, MacRae GA and Jones A (2017). “Out-of-plane buckling behaviour and design of BRB gusset plate connections”. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), January 9-13, Santiago, Chile, Paper No 1419.
AISC (2016). “ANSI/AISC 341-16: Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings”. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
Cui J (2020). “BRB Performance Issues”. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Cui J, Lee C-L and MacRae G (2019). “Strong-axis and weak-axis buckling of buckling restrained braces under bidirectional loading”. Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 4-6, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ozaki H, Konishi Y, Matsui R and Takeuchi T (2014). “Out-Of-plane stability factors for diagonally installed buckling restrained braces”. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 79(706): 1919-1929. (in Japanese) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.79.1919
Takeuchi T, Ozaki H, Matsui R, and Sutcu F (2014). “Out-of-plane stability of buckling-restrained braces including moment transfer capacity”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43(6): 851–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2376
Takeuchi T and Matsui R (2017). “State-of-art stability assessment of buckling-restrained braces”. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), January 9-13, Santiago, Chile, Paper No 602.
Zaboli B, Clifton GC and Cowie K (2018). “BRBF and CBF gusset plates: out-of-plane stability design using a simplified notional load yield line (NLYL) method”. SESOC Journal, 31(1). https://www.sesoc.org.nz/library/sesoc-journals/vol-31-35/#squelch-taas-accordion-shortcode-content-9
Bruneau M and Wei X (2017). “Experimental performance of buckling restrained braces subjected to bidirectional displacement histories”. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), January 9-13, Santiago, Chile, Paper No 819.
Alizadeh S, MacRae GA, Bull D and Clifton C (2018). "Beam web-side-plate connection axial performance". Key Engineering Materials, 763: 174-181. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.174
MacRae GA, Urmson CR, Walpole WR, Moss P, Hyde K and Clifton GC (2009). "Axial shortening of steel columns in buildings subjected to earthquakes". Bulletin of the NZ Society of Earthquake Engineering, 42(4): 275-287. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.4.275-287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.4.275-287
Lee S and Goel SC (1987). “Seismic Behavior of Hollow and Concrete-Filled Square Tubular Bracing Members” Report No. UMCE 87-11, University of Michigan, Department of Civil Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI.
SNZ (2007). “NZS 3404: New Zealand Steel Structures Standard (& Commentary) with Amendments 1 and 2”. Standards New Zealand, Wellington.
Hughes AF, Iles DC and Malik AS (2011). “Design of Beams in Torsion”. SCI Publication 385, 71 pp. https://www.steelconstruction.info/images/6/6f/Sci_p385.pdf
Engineering ToolBox (2009). Beams - Supported at Both Ends - Continuous and Point Loads. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/beam-stress-deflection-d_1312.html [Accessed 03 August 2019].
Gstatic (2019). Universal Joint Image. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRdpe_DupM6J-FVQU3s4mPkC2wVoljeSqCCuW_ci_jSTxvamkwA, (Retrieved 29 July 2019)