Design for low/moderate seismic risk

  • Paolo E. Pinto University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Abstract

The increase of knowledge about seismic hazard worldwide, associated to an increase of awareness of the potential losses due to earthquakes, and economic progress allowing for policies of risk reduction, have led several countries in which seismic hazard was formerly ignored to pay greater attention to seismic design. The paper deals with a number of aspects related to this increased interest. It is first discussed, with reference to the solutions adopted in a few countries, the problem of where to put the lower limit to seismic intensity for which explicit seismic design is worth being carried out. It is shown that the limit varies considerably among countries, depending on economic conditions and on the general quality of the constructions. Based on the results of analytical simulations illustrated in the paper, it is concluded that modern RC buildings can have a substantial capacity to resist earthquake motions, if they have a regular configuration and are correctly designed for gravity loads only. In terms of PGA, this capacity may go up to 0.15 - 0.25g for structural damages still far below the ultimate state. This stresses the greater importance, especially in regions of moderate seismicity, of providing the profession with documents of good practice, rather than with analytically sophisticated codes. Looking at the future, ample space is given in the paper to discuss about which one of the two design methods, the established force- based or the emerging displacement-based is best suited to the needs specific to L/M risk zones. In their present state, they are both less effective for L/M areas than in ones of high seismicity. The DBD approach offers better perspectives for being extended to the L/M case on more rational bases.

References

Browning, J.P. (1998) "Proportioning of Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Building Structures" Ph.Thesis, Purdue University

Calvi, G.M., and Kingsley, G.R. (1995) "Displacement-based Seismic Design of Multi-Degree-of- Freedom Bridge Structures". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.24, pp. 1247-1266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240906

Calvi, G.M. (1998) "Performance-based Approach for Seismic Assessment of Existing Structures" Proc. 11 ECEE, Vol.2, pp. 3-19, Paris September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam NL

CEN TC 250/SC8 (1994) "Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures", ENV 1998-1 Brussels

Elnashai, A.S. and Soliman, M.M. (1994) "Seismic Risk and Mitigation Planning in Egypt" Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Report N. 94/5, July, Imperial College, London.

Fajfar, P. (1992) "Equivalent Ductility Factors, Taking into Account Low-cycle Fatigue" Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21, pp. 837-848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211001

Fardis, M.N. and Panagiotakos, T.B. (1997) "Displacement-based design of RC Buildings: Proposed Approach and Application" Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes. Fajfar & Krawinkler Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, NL

Fardis, M.N. and Panagiotakos, T.B. (1997) "Seismic Design and Response of Bare and Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Part I: Bare Structures". Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.1, N.1, January, pp. 219-256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962367

FEMA 303 (1998) "NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures" 1997 Edition, February 1998.

Garcia, L.E. (1995) "Moderate and Low Seismic Risk Zones Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Buildings" ACI 1995 Fall Convention, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, November. Technical Session sponsored by ACI Committee 368.

GSHP (1993) "Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program". Annali di Geofisica, Vol.XXXV, N.3-4, June-July.

Kowalski, M.J., Priestley, M.J.N. and MacRae, G.A. (1995) "Displacement-based Design of RIC Bridge Columns in Seismic Regions". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.24, pp. 1623-1643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290241206

Hoffmann, G.W., Kunnath, S.K., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1992) "Gravity-Load-Designed Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Seismic Evaluation of Existing Construction and Detailing Strategies for Improved Seismic Resistance". National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Tech.Rep. 92-0016

IAEE International Association for Earthquake Engineering (1996) "Regulations for Seismic Design. A World List". Central Office, Tokyo

Mayer-Rosa, D. (1993) "Towards Uniform Earthquake Hazard Assessment in Europe". Annali di Geofisica, Vol.XXXVI, N. 3-4, June-July

Miranda, E. (1993) "Site-dependent Strength Reduction Factors". Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119, N.12 pp. 3503-3519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3503)

Moehle, J.P. (1996) "Dispacement-Based Seismic Design Criteria". Proc. 11 WCEE, Acapulco, June, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K., Paper N. 2125

NZS 4203 (1992) "Code of Practice for General Structural Design and Design Loadings for Buildings". Wellington, New Zealand

Park, R. (1996) "Explicit Incorporation of Element and Structure Overstrength in the Design Process". Proc. 11 WCEE, Acapulco, June, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K., Paper N.2130

Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalski, M.J. (1999) "Displacement-based Seismic Design of Buildings". Bulletin, New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, (in press).

Priestley, M.J.N. (1999) "Displacement-based Approaches to Rational Limit States Design of New Structures". Proc. 11 ECEE, Vol.2, pp. 317-335, Paris, September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, NL

Pugliese, A., Romeo, R. and Sano, T. (1997) "Seismic Hazard in Italy. Proposal for a new Seismic Zoning" (in italian). Report SSN/RT/97/2, Roma, Italy.

Riddell, R. (1995) "Inelastic Design Spectra Accounting for Soil Conditions". Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, N.24, pp. 1491-1570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290241106

Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A. (1996) "Estimation of Response Spectra and Simulation of Nonstationary Earthquake Ground Motion". Bull. of Seism. Soc.of Am. N. 86-2 (1996) pp. 337-352

Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. and Krawinkler, H. (1996) "Modifications of Seismic Demands for MDOF Systems" Proc. 11 WCEE, Acapulco, June, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, U.K., Paper N. 2129

SIA (1989) "Actions on Structures". Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects, Zurich, Switzerland

Sokol, M. (1999) "Seismic Effecrts on Buildings in Slovakia according to New Codes" Proc. 11 ECEE, Vol.1, pp. 1-6, Paris, September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, NL

Tassios, T.P. (1999) "The Seismic Design: State of Practice" Proc. 11 ECEE, Vol. 2, pp. 255-267, Paris, September 1998, Balkema, Rotterdam, NL

Uniform Building Code (1988) "International Conference of Building Officials". Whittier, California

Published
2000-09-30
How to Cite
Pinto, P. E. (2000). Design for low/moderate seismic risk . Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(3), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.303-324
Section
Articles